Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Transverse asymmetry AT2 of B→K*(→K)l+l- in SM and supersymmetry

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Transverse asymmetry AT2 of B→K*(→K)l+l- in SM and supersymmetry"— Presentation transcript:

1 The Transverse asymmetry AT2 of B→K*(→K)l+l- in SM and supersymmetry
Joaquim Matias Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Orsay, Nov. 2007 U. Egede, T. Hurth, J.M. in progress E.Lunghi, J.M., JHEP 0704:058,2007. F.Kruger, J.M. Phys.Rev.D71:094009,2005

2 Outline Motivation Angular distribution and Transversity Amplitudes of B→K*(→K)l+l- Phenomenological discussion of AT2(s) : SM prediction for the K* polarization at NLO and AT2(s) Main theoretical uncertainties AT2(s) of B→K*(→K)l+l- in supersymmetry Experimental sensitivity to AT2(s) . Conclusions

3 Motivation K* spin amplitudes: A,A ,A0 ,At
B0→K*l+l- provides valuable information in different ways: Branching ratio, FB and isospin asymmetry Angular distribution B→K*(→K)l+l- provide an excellent test of the chiral structure of the fundamental theory that lies beyond the SM Step I Step II Step III K* spin amplitudes: A,A ,A0 ,At Quantities with controlled QCD uncertainties sensitive to right-handed currents. Experimental resolution

4 Angular Distribution in B→K*(→K)l+l- Theoretical Framework
Effective Hamiltonian for decays based on b→sl+l-: We focus on magnetic penguins and semi-leptonic operators: and the primed operator Also chiral partners are considered.

5 Given Heff the matrix element for the decay B→K*(→K)l+l- reads:
q is the four-momentum of the lepton pair mb=mb() is the running mass in the MS scheme. Hadronic matrix elements parametrized in terms of B→K* form factors:

6 How to deal with form factors? Leading order:
Key observation: in the limit of M heavy and Efinal meson large: Ai(s), Ti(s), V(s) form factors reduce to TWO universal form factors (, ) Valid for the soft contribution to the form factor at large recoil. Predictions restricted to the kinematic region: where EK* is large and dilepton mass is small. Violated by symmetry breaking corrections of order s and 1/mb Next to Leading Order: Factorizable & non-factorizable strong interaction corrections in QCDF

7 Transversity amplitudes
The differential decay rate of the decay B0→K*(→K)l+l- is described by four independent kinematic variables: Evaluation using Transversity (or Helicity) amplitudes: lepton and hadron tensors in helicity space:

8 These define the angles of the distribution: in the physical region: *

9 Ii depend on products of the four K* spin amplitudes A,A ,A0 ,At.
Next question is the evaluation of the spin amplitudes (helicity amplitudes)

10 Transversity amplitudes in the heavy quark and E limit:
In the SM (C’7eff=0) recover naive quark-model prediction A=-A in the limit mB → and EK* →. ( )

11 Transversity amplitudes at NLO
We include factorizable & non-factorizable corrections at NLL order replacing: with the Wilson coefficients C9 taken at NNLL order. (f) factorizable and (nf) non-factorizable contributions and

12 The angular distribution of the decay B0→K
The angular distribution of the decay B0→K*(→K)l+l- allows to extract information on K* spin amplitudes. Transverse asymmetries: K* polarization parameter: Fraction of K* polarization: Integrated quantities:

13 Main sources of uncertainty:
The dependence on soft form factors (0) play a fundamental role: AT1(s) and AT2(s) cancel (0) exactly at LO in the limit. Sensitivity of NLL result to scale dependence Variation of mc/mb used 0.27 mc/mb0.31 affects matrix elements of chromomagnetic operator, mainly F1,2(7,9) Error associated to the rest of input parameters (masses, decay constants, etc.) are taken in quadrature. What about the /mb power corrections? we allow

14 AT(1) AT(2) aK*

15 B → K*(→K)l+l- in supersymmetry

16 Gluino mediated FCNC: New Physics model allowing for a large C7eff ’ : AT2(s)  C7eff x C7eff ’ Model: MSSM with non-minimal flavour changing in down-squark sector. The down-squark mass matrix is: where Off-diagonal entries parametrized: We perform exact diagonalization of squark mass matrices.

17 → Main contributions: Penguin diagrams with gluino- down squark.
Minimal Flavour Violation: suppressed by ms/mb Non-zero mass insertion in down sector. From the approximate expressions: Main Parameters of the model: Mgl , (32d)LR , md , tan=5 (low) ~

18 can only increase/decrease
→ Experimental Constraints: Most recent NNLO results reproduced: NLONNLO BR(B→Xs) and Integrated Transverse asymmetries 1 GeV2<s<6 GeV2 SM Exp 95% BR(B→Xs) and AT1 can only increase/decrease with C7eff’

19 → Experimental Constraints:
Mass insertion (32d)LR impacts MBs via: We impose also the constraints from:  parameter: =(-0.5±1.1) x 10-3 Higgs mass: mh > 89.8 GeV supersymmetric particle searches: m± > 100 GeV, m0 > 40 GeV, mq > 100 GeV Automatic fulfillment of Bs→ for low tan  Vacuum stability constraints (absence of CCB and UFB) are ALSO FULFILLED: and both are ~ depending on the average of squark masses and in agreement with our ranges (Don’t be confused with the constrain to a different mass insertion which is irrelevant to us) ~

20 We have explored the space of parameters in two regions:
Results: We have explored the space of parameters in two regions: → SCENARIO A: Specifically: Common: a) b)

21 → SCENARIO B: Specifically:
Common: c) d)

22 Experimental Sensitivity to
AT2

23 Fitting AT2(s), FL(s),… from the individual angle distributions:
Toy Monte Carlo: N0=4032 s b. in 2 fb-1

24 Fit values of AT(2) from 500 toy Monte Carlo: (VERY PRELIMINAR!!!)
1 < q2 < 6 GeV2/c4 using SM assumptions with 2 fb-1 RESOLUTION:

25 AT(1,2): NP in C’7eff and in C9,10
We take also into account the constrain on C9,10 from rare decays A determination of the magnitude of RH currents is possible even in presence of NP in C9,10 of 20%. AT(1,2) are a useful probe of the electromagnetic penguin operator O’7

26 Conclusions The analysis of the angular distribution in the decay B0→K*(→Kp)l+l- provides a new way to test the chiral structure of the fundamental theory. AT(2) asymmetry is the most promising and robust observable: - Low sensitivity to hadronic uncertainties (0), - A measurement in the low dilepton mass region different from their SM values could be a hint of new physics with right-handed quark currents. - They are a useful probe of the operator O7’. Supersymmetry with a with non-minimal flavour changing in down-squark sector has a huge impact on AT(2) even for low tan . Expected resolution for AT(2) is 0.42 but improves tremendously to 0.14 in the very low q2 region where the sensitivity to O7’ is maximal!!!


Download ppt "The Transverse asymmetry AT2 of B→K*(→K)l+l- in SM and supersymmetry"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google