1. TGai Motions Date: 2014-01-22 Authors: January 22, 2014 Name Company
April 2009
doc.: IEEE /1243r1-draft
January 22, 2014
TGai Motions
Date:
Authors:
Name
Company
Address
Phone
René Struik
Struik
Security
Consultancy
Toronto ON, Canada
USA: +1 (415)
Toronto: +1 (647)
Skype: rstruik
Rene Struik (Struik Security Consultancy)
Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

2. January 22, 2014
Comment #2983
Comment: FILS key establishment without a trusted third party clause does not clearly
describe the protocol.
Proposed resolution: This sub-clause is really hard to follow and does not describe
each message and its contents clearly. Please re-work to describe the protocol clearly.
Discussion:
Comment discussed extensively with commenter, so as to get clarification of comment
(since comment itself did not include actionable resolution text).
Verbal notes taken as basis for clarifications thought from commenter, resulting in
document 14/0180r0.
Rene Struik (Struik Security Consultancy)

3. January 22, 2014
Motion #1
Incorporate suggested resolution of CID #2983, as documented in
ai-suggested-resolution-security-comment-CID-2983.
Result: Y/N/A
Rene Struik (Struik Security Consultancy)

4. January 22, 2014
Comment #2222
Comment: The description of what is encrypted and decrypted is in conflict with
section which indicates that the portion of the association frames after the
FILS session element is subject to encrypt/decrypt.
Proposed resolution: Resolve the conflict with section
Discussion:
Main steps:
Removed confusing section
Explicitly mentioned in that Container objects should be incorporated when constructing Association Response frame
Suggested to rename “Secure Container” to “Container” throughout draft, so as to remove confusion.
Rene Struik (Struik Security Consultancy)

5. January 22, 2014
Motion #2
Incorporate suggested resolution of CID #2222, as documented in
ai-suggested-resolution-security-comment-cid-2222.
Result: Y/N/A
Rene Struik (Struik Security Consultancy)