Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ARC-SC-agenda-Mar-2016 Date: Authors: July 2009

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ARC-SC-agenda-Mar-2016 Date: Authors: July 2009"— Presentation transcript:

1 ARC-SC-agenda-Mar-2016 Date: 2016-03-16 Authors: July 2009
doc.: IEEE /0840r0 ARC-SC-agenda-Mar-2016 Date: Authors: David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

2 Agenda for: ARC SC, March 2016, Macau SAR, China
Jan 2009 doc.: IEEE /1455r0 Abstract Agenda for: ARC SC, March 2016, Macau SAR, China David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

3 IEEE 802.11 Architecture Standing Committee
July 2009 doc.: IEEE /0840r0 IEEE Architecture Standing Committee Agenda March 2016 session Chair: Mark Hamilton (Ruckus Wireless) David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

4 Monday, March 14th, PM2 July 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0840r0
David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

5 Attendance, etc. Reminders to attendees:
July 2009 doc.: IEEE /0840r0 Attendance, etc. Reminders to attendees: Sign in for .11 attendance credit Noises off No recordings David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

6 Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
July 2009 doc.: IEEE /0840r0 Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants [Note: Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2]: “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged No duty to perform a patent search David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

7 July 2009 doc.: IEEE /0840r0 Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual Material about the patent policy is available at If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit This slide set is available at David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

8 Call for Potentially Essential Patents
July 2009 doc.: IEEE /0840r0 Call for Potentially Essential Patents If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: Either speak up now or Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or Cause an LOA to be submitted David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

9 Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. Technical considerations remain primary focus Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.

10 ARC Agenda – March 2016 Monday, Mar 14, PM2 Wednesday, Mar 16, AM1
Jan 2009 doc.: IEEE /1455r0 ARC Agenda – March 2016 Monday, Mar 14, PM2 Administrative: Minutes as a component in a (larger) system/5G/IMT-2020: 11-15/0757r1, 11-15/0593r2, 11-15/0842r1, 11-15/1133r0, 11-15/1266r1, 11-15/1376r2 Wednesday, Mar 16, AM1 TGaq architecture discussion update 11-16/0239r3 as a component in a (larger) system/5G/IMT-2020: 11-15/0757r1, /0593r2, 11-15/0842r1, 11-15/1133r0, 11-15/1266r1, 11-15/1376r2 Wednesday, Mar 16, PM1 Updates, no action expected: IEEE 1588 mapping to IEEE IETF/802 coordination: update on multicast over : 11-15/1261r2 802.1AC status update AP/DS/Portal architecture and 802 concepts /0454r0, /1213r1 (slides 9-11) TGak joint topics on architecture – 11-16/0457r0 MIB attributes Design Pattern /0355r3, 11-15/0891r0 Future sessions / SC activities Joint session with TGak and 802.1, Thursday, Mar 17, AM1 David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

11 Jan 2009 doc.: IEEE /1455r0 ARC Minutes January Minutes: David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

12 as a “component” Is usable as a component in a (larger?) system, or should it be: “It should be possible to swap implementations of the component from different sources provided those implementations are compliant to the defined functions and external interfaces.” How to capture data/control/management models, so is usable as a component What is the goal/who is the customer, for this effort? Start with requirements… Analyze current situation, gap… Then go! as a “generic” component as a 3GPP component 802/ as a RIT/SRIT in IMT-2020 Process/organization/structure discussions Management of an ESS (as a ‘black box’)? Especially incorporation of a locally managed ESS into a larger 5G system (management of quality, and timeliness; and tested) } Are these all aligned, in reality?

13 802.11 as a “component” discussion
Broad use cases potentially, and/or focus on 3GPP/5G/IMT-2020 Relate to IEEE-SA work on ‘IEEE role in 5G’ Relate to IEEE ComSoc work on ‘IEEE role in 5G’ 802 EC has kicked off a Standing Committee to discuss If 802 doesn’t do a (joint) submission, could independently Discussion of Joe Levy’s brainstorming presentation (11-16/376)

14 Wednesday, March 16th, AM1

15 OR: Is all this “Have 802.18 do their job?”
EC SC could consider: “IEEE 5G” Work with WP 5D (5G/IMT-2020) on: Contribute to IMT-2020 as: Single technology Multiple technologies One or more technologies via some other body (i.e., 3GPP) [Add?]: Work with WP 5A directly, on spectrum usage [Add?]: Work with Study Group 5/Task Group 5/1 on GHz allocations and sharing studies to use it OR: Ask to have the SC just “figure out how to talk to ITU-R to reach the goal of getting appropriate spectrum”? OR: Is all this “Have do their job?”

16 Wednesday, March 16th, PM1

17 IEEE 1588 mapping to IEEE Update (?)

18 IETF/802 coordination Dorothy Stanley present topics of interest:
Multicast traffic features of Any update, or further action needed? – none Draft will be made available, goal is for April CAPWAP Draft for n has expired Draft alternate tunnel - is unchanged and not clear status/will continue. No actions requested at this time Other? Next meeting IETF 3-8 April 2016 Request to update /.15 IETF Tutorial and projects underway and work of joint interests – Dorothy and Charlie will be generating the document. BOF sessions: ITS-related BOF at the April meeting, would be good to track/get report if possible

19 802.1AC revision Current Status:
There hasn't been a new ballot. Waiting on the RAC to approve the Ethertype. Current ballot status: rejected for the second time.  Presentations for discussion (to be updated, if/as presentations come in): None

20 AP/DS/Portal architecture and 802 concepts
Presentations on architectural description(s) None? Reference presentations (previously reviewed, current status of thinking):

21 Design Pattern for MIB attributes
The WG11 Chair has requested that the ARC SC investigate and create a Design Pattern for MIB attributes of the form “*Implemented” and “*Activated”

22 General Links Donald Eastlake present topics of interest from TGak and 802.1’s parallel work (802.1Qbz) Topics for joint session on Thursday arc-some-more-ds-architecture-concepts.pptx

23 802.11aq (PAD) Any updates, or further collaboration suggested?

24 ARC Future Activities & sessions
ARC SC meets when a specific focused task is requested of the SC for which the is sufficient volunteer interest. Continue work on architectural models, and liaison with TGs in development of their architecture as appropriate How to capture data/control/management models, so is usable as a component; consider standardized mgmt. accesses Participate in 5G/IMT-2020 activities Design Pattern for “*Implemented” and “*Activated” MIB attributes Will also follow 802.1/ activities on links, bridging, and MAC Service definition, Comment on 802.1AC revision project changes/proposals Monitor/report on IETF/802 activities, as needed Monitor/report on IEEE 1588 activities, as needed If you have ANY other topic that you would like ARC SC to consider, contact the SC chair.

25 Planning for May 2016 Plan for two individual meeting slots
Usual slot on Wed AM1 Another slot for standalone ARC work (Monday/Tuesday?) Another slot joint with ak (Thursday’s slot) Individuals interested in ARC work are encouraged to also attend other TGak or TGaq sessions, and monitor 5G/IMT-2020 activities One teleconference Date/time TBD May schedule another with 10 days notice if discussion warrants

26 Thursday, March 17th, AM1 Joint session with TGak, 802.1 See TGak for detailed agenda


Download ppt "ARC-SC-agenda-Mar-2016 Date: Authors: July 2009"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google