Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Mari Quenemoen Research Coordinator, NAAC

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Mari Quenemoen Research Coordinator, NAAC"— Presentation transcript:

1 Current Practices in AA-AAS: Results from the 2009 State Survey and Typology Project
Mari Quenemoen Research Coordinator, NAAC National Conference on Student Assessment June 23, 2010

2 2009 Survey Results Content alignment
Methods for determining achievement levels Scorers Scoring methods Rubric analysis Test formats

3 Content Alignment Complete transition to alignment with academics Extended/expanded academic content standards (27 states) or grade level academic content standards (16) No states align AA-AAS to functional skills, and IEP teams no longer determine the content of the test for individual students

4 Methods for Determining Achievement Levels

5 Who Scores the AA-AAS?

6 AA-AAS Scoring Procedures

7 Outcomes Measured by Rubrics

8 AA-AAS Approaches 40% of states use a portfolio or body of evidence (40% of these are standardized) 36% use a standardized set of performance events/tasks (44% of which require the submission of evidence) 16% use a multiple choice test

9 AA-AAS Typology Project
Quenemoen, M., Quenemoen, R., Kearns, J., & Kennedy, S. (in press). A Proposed Typology for Characterizing States’ AA-AAS: Developing a Common Language to Describe These Assessments. Lexington, KY: National Alternate Assessment Center. Quenemoen, M., Perie, M., & Kearns, J. (in press). A Proposed Typology of AA-AAS Scoring Practices. Lexington, KY: National Alternate Assessment Center.

10 AA-AAS Typology Project: Approaches
Portfolios Collection of student work Tasks/activities are teacher designed Measures fewer benchmarks or objectives (usually 2 – 6 per content area) Rating Scale Teachers rate student performance on a relatively long list of skills, which may include “threads” of predetermined achievement progressions for each skill.

11 AA-AAS Typology Project: Approaches (cont.)
Item-Based Approaches: Performance Tasks Tasks are pre-scripted (not teacher-designed) Process and outcome-oriented May contain a series of related activities May involve solving problems using manipulatives Constructed Response Students produce an independent response to a question or prompt Multiple Choice Students select the correct answer from three or more possible answer choices, which may be textual, pictorial, or tactile

12 AA-AAS Typology Project: Approaches (cont.)

13 AA-AAS Typology Project: Approaches (cont.)

14 AA-AAS Typology Project: Scoring
Performance/accuracy Bivariate right/wrong approach, or multivariate approaches including mastery scales or partial credit. Rubrics Assign separate points (beyond right/wrong) to two or more dimensions. Bi-dimensional scales Combine two elements into one scale. Most bi-dimensional scales employ what many states call a “scaffolded” system of increasing prompts or supports.

15 AA-AAS Typology Project: Scoring (cont.)
Student Measures: Generalization Measures: Performance / Accuracy Generalization Level of Independence Context Progress Settings Item Measures: System Measures: Alignment to Standards Self-Determination Complexity Interactions Appropriateness Self-Evaluation Participation Choice Supports/Accommodations

16 AA-AAS Typology Project: Scoring (cont.)

17 Mari Quenemoen Research Coordinator, NAAC mari. quenemoen@uky
Mari Quenemoen Research Coordinator, NAAC


Download ppt "Mari Quenemoen Research Coordinator, NAAC"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google