1. Volume 382, Issue 9903, Pages 1496-1506 (November 2013)
Percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting versus conservative management for fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (PLUTO): a randomised trial 
Rachel K Morris, PhD, Gemma L Malin, MD, Elisabeth Quinlan-Jones, MSc, Lee J Middleton, MSc, Karla Hemming, PhD, Danielle Burke, MSc, Jane P Daniels, PhD, Prof Khalid S Khan, MSc, Prof Jon Deeks, PhD, Prof Mark D Kilby, DSc 
The Lancet 
Volume 382, Issue 9903, Pages (November 2013)
DOI: /S (13)
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
Trial profile
Normal renal function is defined as serum creatinine less than 50 μmol/L; mild renal impairment is defined as serum creatinine of 50 μmol/L or more, not requiring medical treatment; moderate renal impairment is defined as serum creatinine of 50 μmol/L or more, requiring medical treatment; end-stage renal failure is defined as need for transplant or dialysis. TOP=termination of pregnancy. *Two treatment related TOPs occurred secondary to spontaneous rupture of membranes after shunt insertion at 17 and 22 weeks. † Parental decision at 18–25 weeks. ‡After spontaneous rupture of membranes at 16 weeks. §Due to pulmonary hypoplasia.
The Lancet  , DOI: ( /S (13) )
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2 Results of Bayesian analysis
Bayesian prior and posterior estimates of relative risk of survival to age 28 days. The prior distribution (A) was obtained by eliciting prior distributions from 52 experts, averaging the distributions, and fitting a normal distribution. The posterior distribution (B) is based on combining the elicited prior with the intention-to-treat results. The posterior distribution (C) is based on combining a non-informative prior with the intention-to-treat results.
The Lancet  , DOI: ( /S (13) )
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival from conception to end of follow-up
Vertical dashes on the lines represent censored observations, either through parental choice to terminate pregnancy (before 36·5 weeks) or end of follow-up. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for the period 0–36·5 weeks and from 36·5 weeks to the end of follow-up (conditional on survival to 36·5 weeks). These HRs are Bayesian estimates based on non-informative priors. The hazard rate comparison is of conservative management versus vesicoamniotic shunt, such that the interpretation of HRs greater than 1 as being indicative of benefit is consistent with the interpretation of the relative risk estimates. CrI=credibility interval.
The Lancet  , DOI: ( /S (13) )
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions