1. Capacity, Capability, and Performance: Different Constructs or Three of a Kind? 
Laura Holsbeeke, MSc, Marjolijn Ketelaar, PhD, Marina M. Schoemaker, PhD, Jan Willem Gorter, MD, PhD 
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Volume 90, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
DOI: /j.apmr
Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
Pearson correlations between motor capacity (GMFM-66 score), motor capability (PEDI Functional Skills scaled mobility score), and motor performance (PEDI Caregiver Assistance scaled mobility score). *Significant correlation P <.001 (2-tailed)
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
A scatterplot of motor capacity (GMFM-66 score) versus motor capability (PEDI Functional Skills scaled mobility score); points represent single children and are based on GMFCS levels.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
A scatterplot of motor capacity (GMFM-66 score) versus motor performance (PEDI Caregiver Assistance scaled mobility score); points represent single children and are based on GMFCS levels.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

5. Fig 4
As catterplot of motor capability (PEDI Functional Skills scaled mobility score) versus motor performance (PEDI Caregiver Assistance scaled mobility score); points represent single children and are based on GMFCS levels.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions