1. NEW DID LIST presented at the March 2014 EUEB
Implementation of the new DID list
how to behave when handling applications
NEW DID LIST presented at the March 2014 EUEB
(Same format-Appendix B changes-a new parameter added)
Implementation:
Danish proposal:
1: applications received after the implementation shall be handled using the revised DID list. (In the Nordic scheme applicants can choose either lists – but not mix
values from the two lists)
2: changes in already existing licenses (recipes) can be based on either the old list or if the applicant prefer to have a new calculation only based on the new list.
Example:
”The most up to date version of the DID list available at the time of application should be used, and will be available
from the Competent Body dealing with the application.

2. NEW DID LIST presented at the March 2014 EUEB
Implementation of the new DID list
how to behave when handling applications
NEW DID LIST presented at the March 2014 EUEB
Implementation:
Austrian Proposal
We ask to use the revised DID-list
for the revision of the criteria
and afterwards for the applications according to the revised criteria

3. NEW DID LIST presented at the March 2014 EUEB
Implementation of the new DID list
how to behave when handling applications
NEW DID LIST presented at the March 2014 EUEB
Implementation:
Norway proposal:
1.      The applicant can chose whether he wants to use the 2007-list or the 2014-revised list, but he cannot pick and choose single data from both list in the same application.
2.      If he has chosen to use the 2007-list, but the recipe contains a chemical that is only on the 2014-list, he can use the data for this particular chemical in the CDV-calculation.
Austria agreed on this!

4. Question Do we agree with Norway proposal?
What about NEW CALCULATION SHEETS to be developed for all Product Groups?