1. IMT-Advanced Closing Report
September 2008
doc.: IEEE /1187r0
September 2008
IMT-Advanced Closing Report
Date:
Authors:
Name
Company
Address
Phone
Bruce Kraemer
Marvell
5488 Marvell Ln
Santa Clara, CA
95054 +1 -
321 4 27
4098
marvell
.com
Darwin Engwer
Nortel
Networks
4655 Great America
Pkwy, Santa Clara
CA 95054
408
495
2588
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

2. Key Meeting Documents IMT Opening Report 11-08-0940 r1
September 2008
Key Meeting Documents
IMT Opening Report r1
IMT Review Process r4
IMT-Adv Regulatory Background r2
in IMT-Advanced r0
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

3. IMT-ADV Schedule September 2008 Dubai Korea
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

4. One Page Summary Most of Circular letter components completed in Dubai
September 2008
One Page Summary
Most of Circular letter components completed in Dubai
IMT.TECH contents/numbers finalized
IMT.EVAL contents/numbers finalized
Circular letter structure finalized
Work to perform final cleanup and formatting will continue in correspondence
Circular letter contents to be completed in WP5D Seoul, Korea October 8-15
Technology Templates
Also Workshop Tuesday October 7
WP5D Reports require approval by SG5 in November 10,11
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

5. July 802.11 Conclusion Pursue the following topic:
September 2008
doc.: IEEE /1187r0
September 2008
July Conclusion
Pursue the following topic:
How quickly/best can we determine complementary fit with 16m and seriously consider an SRIT submission?
Explore possibility of joint 11/16 teleconference discussion.
Obtain/review 16m evaluation of IMT.TECH fit.
Explore how to achieve handoff (for example use of .21 mechanisms)?
Establish timing of decision/engineering input – deadline?
Establish Teleconferences to discuss topic prior to September
Include IMTA discussion topic in September schedule
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

6. IMT-A/802.11/802.21 – Target Topic Sep 08
September 2008
doc.: IEEE /1187r0
September 2008
IMT-A/802.11/ – Target Topic Sep 08
Background
IMT-A SRIT including solution requires use of
is not sufficiently interested in IMT-A to submit its technology as a RIT.
Without RIT status would need to consider a less direct “partnership” relationship such as as a media independent handover mechanism for non technologies
Allows to be compliant with solution
Goals
Is the mechanism currently usable for / handover in the context of IMT.TECH?
If not, exactly what needs to be added to , or to ensure adequate functionality?
Generate slides for WG16 to consider including in their IMT-A Workshop presentation.
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)

7. Questions #1 16 has mobile base stations and clients
September 2008
Questions #1
16 has mobile base stations and clients
11 has mesh , 16 has relay stations that could be fixed or mobile
Can 21 handle all of these terminal types?
Can 21 provide handover and meet circular letter requirements?
How can 11 determine that it would meet minimum requirements to be accepted as an RIT?
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

8. Question List #2 3GPP has ANDSF which parallels (or uses) 21.
September 2008
Question List #2
3GPP has ANDSF which parallels (or uses) 21.
If 11 could use ANDSF it would be a valuable option.
21 might be used to increase the number of RIT interfaces especially if tied into the 3GPP RIT if connected through ANDSF
Is 21 specification mature enough to be used
Security is not developed
Insufficient liaisons/support from mobile SDOs e.g. 3GPP
21 has good relationship with FMCA which suggests good link into wireline services with wired and wireless endpoints
Rather than 21, interface thru TGu might be more viable
Better metrics?: Lower latency, shorter schedule time, security
Is there anything missing from TGU?
Does TGu have adequate liaisons and SDO acceptance?
Is there any RIT that actually wants to partner with 11 in an SRIT?
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

9. Goal for November Bring IMT-A to a WG11 vote in November
September 2008
doc.: IEEE /1187r0
September 2008
Goal for November
Bring IMT-A to a WG11 vote in November
Present viability evaluation of handover options TGu, ANDSF, 21
Are these options or any other of sufficient value to 11?
Can any solution or project meet the IMT-A submission schedule requirements
Can 11 convince any RIT candidate that it would be a valuable SRIT partner
Or useful add-on?
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer(Nortel)