1. WELCOME BACK to the 2nd day of the LONDON CONFERENCE on
CLIMATE CHANGE:
Science & Geoethics at
Conway Hall
September 8 and 9, 2016
Organized by the Independent Committee on Geoethics (ICG)
Nils-Axel Mörner, Secretary-General

2. to ATTEND – LISTEN – DEBATE
Welcome
to ATTEND – LISTEN – DEBATE
and experience
“The New Dawn of Truth”

3. Day-2 program
September 9

4. Commentary
Notes
A duck or a rabbit
but certainly not a rat

5. We have a dense program today, too
We have to work together to keep time
that is:
The speakers must keep their time
The Chair-persons must watch the time
The Questions & Comments must be to the point
The day ends with a General Discussion
where the time-frames are looser
and we hope for a good dialogue

6. This conference is made possible by generous donations
In calendar order of donation
from:
Madhav Khandekar
Pamela Klein
Philip Foster
Christopher Monckton
Nicola Scafetta
Ed Flaherty
Michael Limburg
Oliver Manuel
Albrecht Glatzle
Arve Tunstad
Tom Wysmuller
Maria Araujo
Viv Forbes
David Bowen
Carmen Smith
Peter Gill
Peter Ward
Ned Nikolov
Benjamin Huguet
Axel Henning
Nils-Axel Mörner
Jan-Erik & Gunvor Solheim
Trygve Eklund
Alex Pope
Pierre Bouteille
Fraocois Gauchenot
Rpbertt Heath
Axel Henney
Camille Veyers
Narendra Limbu
Wiliam Bailey
Benjamin Huguet
Michael Jefferson
Peter Kirby
Michael Purves
Benoit Rittaud
Ian Tayler
Karl Zeller
Justine Darawska
John Graham
and non-attending persons:
Konrad Hartman
Andrew Williams
John Billot
Mark Fowler
Caroline Kettle
Edward Hurst
Alfred Stoller
Brett Keane
Robert Delnon
Richard Dommer
Francis Lyon
All private persons making
personal donations

7. Down-streamers and mainstreamers Up-streamers
follow the main flow
which contains a lot of garbage and “dead fishes”
Up-streamers
go against the main flow,
which costs both strength and courage
i.e. in science: deep knowledge and vivid vigour
It is true that all the papers presented
will be given by “up-streamers”
(“climate realists”, as we say, and “climate deniers” as Ban Ki Moon says)
All speakers give their papers as subject specialists
(i.e. with no hidden agenda or organisation behind)
At the General Discussions,
I call for an open debate with respect of different opinions

8. So, dear Participants In the real world
be very welcome to this second day:
have fun
take part in the discussions
and help us to make this conference
truly interesting and constructive
In the real world
there is, indeed, much to discuss and learn*
*Michael Jefferson said it in 2010: How much do we really know about climate change? Not as much as we might like. And we should not pretend otherwise.

9. An e-mail comment by one of our participants
All these lies,
it makes my head spin!
An comment by one of our participants

10. The mean curve of 102 CO2-driven (i.e. AGW) models (green)
giving a rise of +2.7 °C (±0.7) by year 2100
and the observational readings of true temperature changes
on Earth’s surface (red) and in the troposphere (blue)
indicating a temperature below +1 °C by year 2100.
Obviously,
there is a significant disagreement between Models and Observations.
In Science,
we always have to prioritized observational facts.
At the COP21 agreement,
they prioritized models and ignored observations.
Therefore, it is an urgent need to go back to the primary facts: – i.e. “ad fonts”

11. The Big CO2 Illusion – in focus today
We are gathered to explore if the idea of a CO2-driven global warming is real or just another hoax (bluff).
The post-industrial and post-war rise in atmospheric CO2 seem to have:
– Little (maybe even negligible) effect on global temperature – No effect at all on sea level changes – Negligible effect on global acidification
Therefore, the recent rise in atmospheric CO2 rather seems beneficial to the Plant Kingdom, and hence to life on Planet Earth. The claim of an urgent need of a transition into “a low carbon Earth” seems exaggerated, unfounded and illusive.