Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJuuso Härkönen Modified over 6 years ago
1
Cumulative probability of being in one ordinal response category (or above)
2
IRT Item information functions for GHQ-12 (in a primary care sample) under Samejima’s
graded response model (GRM) : panels are ordered 6 positive items then six negative
3
Coeff Thresh 1 2 3 Discrimination 1 -1.850 0.491 1.894 2.366
4
Scale scores (Emp Bayes)
factor.scores(ghq12ord4) Factor-Scores for observed response patterns: V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 Obs Exp z1 se.z1
5
Positively worded items scored 1000
GHQ01 GHQ03 GHQ04 GHQ07 GHQ08 GHQ12 F1 GHQ Pos F2 GHQ Neg Orthogonal GHQ02 GHQ05 GHQ06 GHQ09 GHQ10 GHQ11 Negatively items scored 0011
6
cut ighq_+ (1) ighq_- (2) IGHQA Category 1 0.058 Category 2 0.942
IGHQC Category Category IGHQD Category Category IGHQG Category Category IGHQH Category Category IGHQL Category Category IGHQB Category Category IGHQE Category Category IGHQF Category Category IGHQI Category Category IGHQJ Category Category IGHQK Category Category
7
1 v 2 factor: 1000+(pos) 0011-(neg)
RMSEA ESTIMATE IS ROOT MEAN SQUARE RESIDUAL IS VARIMAX ROTATED LOADINGS ________ ________ IGHQB IGHQE IGHQF IGHQI IGHQJ IGHQK IGHQA IGHQC IGHQD IGHQG IGHQH IGHQL PROMAX ROTATED LOADINGS IGHQB IGHQE IGHQF IGHQI IGHQJ IGHQK IGHQA IGHQC IGHQD IGHQG IGHQH IGHQL PROMAX FACTOR CORRELATIONS EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS WITH 1 FACTOR(S) : RMSEA ESTIMATE IS ROOT MEAN SQUARE RESIDUAL IS ESTIMATED FACTOR LOADINGS 1 ________ IGHQB IGHQE IGHQF IGHQI IGHQJ IGHQK IGHQA IGHQC IGHQD IGHQG IGHQH IGHQL
8
SCREENING FOR ? Positive (mental) health/ Change in health
SCREENING FOR CMD Anxiety + Depression
9
so … What does 1000 scoring of GHQ positive items do/measure? A. Recent change in (physical) health? B. Vitality/Energy? C. A second as yet unknown dimension of psychosocial functioning/positive health? D. Well-being (what’s that?!) And why study this alongside GHQ negative items scored as 0011? …
10
Able to concentrate Lost much sleep Playing a useful part Capable of making decisions Under stress Could not overcome difficulties Enjoy normal activities Can face up to problems Feeling unhappy and depressed Losing confidence Thinking of self as worthless Feeling reasonably happy
11
Limitations Future opportunities
Analyses not currently sensitive to household clustering issues Analyses clearly not making use of valuable, relevant and extensive, longitudinal data (!!!!) Not all construct validity domains exploited CASP (next speaker), Life satisfaction Future opportunities Big Five personality data collected on BHPS survey members (50 items) in wave 15; data now available?
14
From Data to Paper (via Stata)
That’s all folks: tell us what you think IT’S FEEDBACK TIME
16
http://psychometrics. sps. cam. ac. uk/page/184/stata
Written byJean-Benoit Hardouin (University of Nantes)
17
Methods for uni- and multiple dimensions: new models for multi-item measures when uni-dimensional means “somewhat multidimensional”
18
Latent structure models some schematics: GHQ-28
B D C
19
General and Specific Factors
General factor – loadded by all items Specific factors – orthogonal to General, and to eachother (Specifics)
21
“A plausible factorial structure for many types
Full-Information Item Bifactor Analysis of Graded Response Data Bhaumik, David J. Kupfer, Ellen Frank, Victoria J. Grochocinski and Angela Stover Robert D. Gibbons, R. Darrell Bock, Donald Hedeker, David J. Weiss, Eisuke Segawa, Dulal K. Applied Psychological Measurement 2007; 31; 4 “A plausible factorial structure for many types of psychological and educational tests exhibits a general factor and one or more group or method factors. This structure can be represented by a bifactor model. The bifactor structure results from the constraint that each item has a nonzero loading on the primary dimension and, at most, one of the group factors. The authors develop estimation procedures for fitting the graded response model when the data follow the bifactor structure.
22
Full-Information Item Bifactor Analysis of Graded Response Data Bhaumik, David J. Kupfer, Ellen Frank, Victoria J. Grochocinski and Angela Stover Robert D. Gibbons, R. Darrell Bock, Donald Hedeker, David J. Weiss, Eisuke Segawa, Dulal K. Applied Psychological Measurement 2007; 31; 4 In constructing scales to measure quality of life, investigators…have selected life satisfaction items from several domains ... Although the instrument is designed to measure a single overall concept … a result of the two-stage sampling procedure (i.e., domains within a construct and items within domains) frequently produces rating scales with a multidimensional structure.
23
Information Functions Bifactor Analysis: GHQ-28 NSHD
24
Analysed using ItemFA:ItemRT
Suite FA Construct validity of a six-dimensional psychological well-being measure 42 items: self-report Qu. Likert style responses Item wording effects Two method factors Attempt to remove some nuisance covariance from similar response set to similarly worded items Analysed using ItemFA:ItemRT
25
Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff's psychological well-being items in a UK birth cohort sample of women. Rosemary Abbott, George Ploubdis, Felicia Huppert, Diana Kuh, Michael Wadsworth and Tim Croudace Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2006, 4:76 Free pdf online
26
Checklist… use c:\EGO_GHQ12_id.dta renvars recode order
corrtab ghq01-ghq09, spearman genscore ghq* corrtab ghq01 ghq03 ghq04 ghq07 ghq08 ghq12 score, spearman corrtab ghq02 ghq05 ghq06 ghq09 ghq10 ghq11 score, spearman Pcorr2 extremes xsum alpha , d c a l i s cialpha factor, ml fa(2) Loadingplot estat factors rotate, bentler estat rotatecompare rotate,promaz estat structure Hangroot Clv sample 300, c su keep ghq* id use c:\EGO_GHQ12_id.dta cfa1 ghq01-ghq12,unitvar stata2mplus using c:\EGO_GHQ12_1234.for_ml_cfa1.dta pca ghq* predict pca1 pca2 multihist pca1 pca2 cfa1 ghq01-ghq12,unitvar vce(sbentler) genscore ghq*, score(ghqsum) runparscale ghq01-ghq12, id(id) runname(EGOGHQ121234n300) multihist pca* *sum theta* corrtab pca* *sum theta* corrtab pca* *sum theta*, sig polychoricpca ghq01-ghq12, nsco(2) score(pcpca) corrtab ghqsum pca1 pcapca1 theta* cfa1score corrtab ghqsum pca1 pcpca1 theta* corrtab ghqsum pca1 pcpca1 theta*, sig obs graph matrix ghqsum pca1 pcpca1 theta*
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.