1. MDM-PAB Meeting – Uttar Pradesh on 9.04.2013
Mid Day Meal Scheme
MDM-PAB Meeting – Uttar Pradesh on
Ministry of HRD
Government of India

2. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Part-I
Review of Implementation of MDMS in UTTAR PRADESH (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. Component-wise performance under Primary Stage
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

4. Component-wise performance under Upper Primary Stage
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

5. Coverage : Institutions : Approval Vs Achievement (Pry)
No. of Institutions
98%
98%
94%
ASER, MDM was served in 86% schools on the day of visit.
MDM not covered in 5598 new schools (under construction ), NCLP, 16 Madarsa & 194 merged schools etc.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. Coverage : Institutions : Approval Vs Achievement (U.Pry)
No. of Institutions
91%
98%
98%
ASER, MDM was served in 86% schools on the day of visit.
MDM not covered in 590 new schools (under construction), 553 intermediate and Aided Schools of western U.P. due to court case , 89 Madarsa & merged schools.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

7. Coverage : Enrolment Vs Achievement (Pry)
No. of Children (in lakhs)
53%
55%
62%
ASER, % attendance on the day of visit.
Percentage indicates coverage of children against the Total Enrolment
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

8. Coverage : Children Enrolment Vs Achievement (U.Pry)
No. of Children (in lakhs)
53%
42%
48%
ASER, % attendance on the day of visit.
Percentage indicates coverage of children against the Total Enrollment
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

9. Coverage : Children Approval Vs Achievement (NCLP)
No. of Children
631schools covered.
73%
40%
No. of NCLP Institutions = 1430
Approved No of Working days=312 Covered :167 days
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

10. Less Coverage of Children vis-à-vis enrolment (Primary)
District
Enrolment
Avg. Availed MDM
% Less Coverage
Severe Anemia among children
Severe Anemia among adolescent girls
SHRAWASTI
113564
40298
65%
0.7% 9%
BAREILLY
295378
110087
63%
3.1%
25.6%
AMBEDKAR NAGAR
157849
62694
60%
1.8%
30.1%
PILIBHIT
156454
67919
57%
1.3%
29.8%
BHADOHI
130930
57028
56% -
MAU
171300
75121
2.2%
24.4%
BARABANKI
274799
125940
54%
1.4%
18.2%
BANDA
178049
82508
4.3%
52.5%
SHAHJAHANPUR
288839
134874
53%
2.4%
28.1%
BAHRAICH
385447
180260
0.4%
8.3%
BALRAMPUR
226780
106433
2.1%
31.7%
FIROZABAD
148721
70771
52%
4.9%
25.8%
ALLAHABAD
360326
172838
2.3%
46.2%
AMETHI
183040
88392
KAUSHAMBI
133415
64558
46.5%
SAMBHAL
178882
86674
VARANASI
210039
102710
51%
2.5%
23.8%
SULTANPUR
182053
90412
50%
13.2%
ALIGARH
184233
92276
0.6%
30.3%

11. Less Coverage of Children vis-à-vis enrolment (Upper Primary)
District
Enrolment
Avg. Availed MDM
% Less Coverage
Severe Anemia among children
Severe Anemia among adolescent girls
JAUNPUR
189570
60049
68% 2%
17.5%
ALIGARH
90511
29270
0.6%
30.3%
SHRAWASTI
34761
11464
67%
0.7% 9%
AMBEDKAR NAGAR
79103
28470
64%
1.8%
30.9%
ALLAHABAD
173051
63151
2.3%
46.2%
MUZAFFARNAGAR
51525
19522
62%
9.2%
70.1%
HAPUR
28877
11232
61% -
MAU
96248
37554
2.2%
24.4%
SHAMLI
25155
9823
SULTANPUR
84511
33384
60%
2.1%
13.2%
PILIBHIT
78653
31147
1.3%
29.8
BULANDSHAHR
101129
40078
0.9%
12.1%
FIROZABAD
58590
24002
59%
4.9%
25.8%
Cont….

12. Less Coverage of Children vis-à-vis enrolment (Upper Primary)
Cont….
Less Coverage of Children vis-à-vis enrolment (Upper Primary)
District
Enrolment
Avg. Availed MDM
% Less Coverage
Severe Anemia among children
Severe Anemia among adolescent girls
KAUSHAMBI
42792
17575
59%
2.4%
46.5%
MAINPURI
54180
22582
58%
1.8%
24.4%
BADAUN
91932
38763
9.6%
43.3%
SHAHJAHANPUR
129464
55122
57%
28.1%
BARABANKI
99365
42896
1.4%
18.2%
BAHRAICH
104447
46477
56%
0.4%
8.3%
SANT KABIR NAGAR
63750
28424
55%
1.7%
45.8%
RAE BARELI
78775
35345
1.3%
18.6%
LUCKNOW
74808
33633
2.2%
12.7%
GORAKHPUR
117118
53032
15.1%
BANDA
83466
38118
54%
4.3%
52.5%
AGRA
83920
38617
3.7%
20.3%
PRATAPGARH
109146
50391
16.0%
BHADOHI
54687
25267 -
ETAH
59273
27542
21.3%

13. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Coverage : Working Days Approval Vs Achievement (Primary) (first 3 qtr)
No. of Working Days
106%
104%
94%
ASER, MDM was served in 86% schools on the day of visit.
10 days less covered due to Academic session started late i.e. on 8th July instead of 1st July 2012, extended summer vacation, extreme cold weather
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

14. Coverage : Working Days Approval Vs Achievement (Up.Pry) (first 3 qtr)
No. of Working Days
106%
105%
94%
ASER, MDM was served in 86% schools on the day of visit.
10 days less covered due to Academic session started late i.e. on 8th July instead of 1st July 2012, extended summer vacation, extreme cold weather
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

15. Approval Vs Achievement: Number of Meals (Pry + U. Pry.first 3 qtr)
No. of Meals (in crore)
81%
102%
79%
Less Meals Served - Hapur 40%, Shamli, Rai Bareli 38%, Muzaffarnagar, 37% Jaunpur 36%, Gazipur 36% , Amethi and J.P. Nagar 35% Amedkarnagar, Banda & Firozabad 34% Bareilly, Meerut &Lucknow, 32% Kaushambi, Varanasi and Pratapgarh 31%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

16. FOOD GRAIN : ALLOCATION vs. UTILISATION
Quantity in MTs
61%
74%
57%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

17. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Foodgrains : Opening Balance, Allocation & Lifting ( to )
Foodgrains (in Thousand MTs)
71%
57%
57% utilization is against allocation
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

18. Payment of cost of Food grains to FCI
Cost of Food Grain (Rs. In Lakh )
61%
As per FCI statement Rs lakh (72%) outstanding as on
State has informed all bills of Rs. 160 crores have been paid till March 2013 including pending bills for and
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

19. COOKING COST: ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION
Rs in Lakh
74%
61%
56%
Cooking cost utilization in Hapur 11%, Meerut 23% Ghaziabad 27% and Muzzafarnagar 30% only
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

20. Approval Vs Achievment Engagement of Cooks-cum-Helpers
Primary + Upper Primary
No. of CCH
90%
45126 CCH not engaged
The State has submitted the proposal for reduction of Cook Cum Helpers from
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

21. Honorarium to Cooks-cum-Helpers
Central Share in allocation : Lakh
State Share in allocation : Lakh
Rs. In Lakh
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

22. MME: ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION
Rs in Lakhs
47%
36%
35%
Inspection of 112% schools upto 3rd qtr
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

23. Transportation Assistance : ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION
Rs in Lakhs
102%
65%
33%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

24. Achievement up to 2012-13 (Kitchen cum Stores)
Total Sanctioned :
Physical: Kitchen Cum Stores
Financial : lakh
Progress (in %)
65131
109823
12258
9571
491
297
MIS data shows that kitchen-cum-store completed in schools.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

25. Achievement up to 2012-13 (Kitchen Devices)
Total Sanctioned : units of Kitchen Devices
Progress (in %)
MIS data shows availability of kitchen devices in schools.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

26. Availability of Infrastructure
Availability in % schools
ASER data Usable toilets for girls 44%.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

27. Coverage of Institute under School Health Programme
Aashirwad Bal Swasthya Guarantee Scheme for the year has started from 1st February 2013 with the result the State has shown zero performance till December 2012.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

28. SCORE CARD- ALL COMPONENTS
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

29. ISSUES
47% children primary and 52% upper primary not covered under MDM.
10 working days less covered
45126 CCH not Engaged.
Low utilization of MME (47%) and TA (33%)
No school health programme

30. Findings of Monitoring Institutions
The hot cooked meal not regularly served to the students in Gonda, Raebareli Ambedkarnagar,Mahoba due to non availability of conversion cost,food grains.
Cooking cost reaching late to schools– 1 to 4 months.(4 months late in Firozabad)
Children Dissatisfaction- The Quality of MDM is not better, Lack of green vegetable and Menu based food.
Children are not happy with Daliya and rice & the quantity is less in S.R.N.Bhadohi,Gorakhpur,Raibareilly,Gonda,Mahoba,Jhansi,Hathras,Mathura, Etawah
The quality of food supplied by NGO was not good in Ghaziabad,Gautam Buddh Nagar,Baghpat, Ambedkar Nagar
Payment to the cooks was irregular -1 to 3 months.(3-5 months late in Firozabad)

31. Findings of Monitoring Institutions.
Kitchen-cum-stores not constructed in S.R.N. Bhadohi(14%), Gorakhpur(21%), Fatehpur(22%), Allahabad(31%) in visited schools.
Delay of food grain delivery in Ghaziabad(PS-14.28% and in UPS 5.88%), Amroha(4 (16%) PS and 1(7.14%) UPS ).
The quality of food grain not good in (12% in PS) in Baghpat, (4.76% PS) Ghaziabad
Drinking water facility in defunct position in Bhadohi (4 schools),Gorakhpur(4 schools), Deoria(13schools), Fatehpur(13 schools), Allahabad (13schools).
UPS chowk (Amroha nagar) from july to the MDM has not started. The selection of cooks has not been done the school has also not received any grant for the above.
Health cards were not in Schools and children are also not given micronutrient-medicines.
The utensils are Insufficient in some of the schools

32. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2013-14
PART -2
Analysis of State’s Proposal for
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

33. Proposal for 2013-14: Children (Primary)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Q-1
Q-2
Q-3
IVRS
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

34. Proposal for 2013-14: Children (Upper Primary)
No. of children (in lakhs)
IVRS
Q-1
Q-2
Q-3
IVRS
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

35. Proposal for Cook-cum-helper engaged in MDM Scheme
PAB Approval
Already Engaged
Additional Reqmt ( )
4,34,032
3,88,906
Nil
45126 CCH not Engaged.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

36. Proposal for Construction of Kitchen-cum-Store
No. of Inst. Eligible for Kitchen –cum-Store
Sanctioned
Constructed through convergence
Gap
Proposal
167865
122572
8535
Saturated
5833
In there was no gap and hence saturated
Note for the year State has given proposal for 5833 schools of Kitchen cum Store.
The Central share of Rs crores is available with the State Govt. No separate Central Assistance is required for this purpose. State needs just permission of GOI to construct 5833 kitchen SRS Rate from the fund available with the State.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

37. Proposal for Procurement of Kitchen Devices
No. of institutions
Sanctioned
Procured through convergence
Gap
Proposal
1,69,621
1,57,840
Nil
11,781
10,932
State has submitted proposal for 9424 units for replacement.
34607 units are eligible for replacement sanctioned in
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

38. Proposals and Recommendations
S. No
Component
PAB Approval
Proposal
Recommendation 1
Children (Pry) 2
Children (U Pry) 3
NCLP
42519
22910 4
Working Day
(Pry & U Pry)
234
312
243
287 5
Kitchen cum Store
Saturated
5833 6
Cook cum Helper
434032
432602 7
Kitchen Devices
9601 for new 9668 for replacement
10932 for new 9424 for replacement 8
Notional Requirement of Central Assistance
Existing Rate
Rs Crore
Proposed Rate
Rs Crore
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

39. The MDM Logo should be Widely Publicized.
It may be Painted at prominent Places on the outside wall of the school.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

40. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Dining Hall in Tripura
Thank you
Thank You
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India