Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

BSR Guidelines and Annual Tests

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "BSR Guidelines and Annual Tests"— Presentation transcript:

1 BSR Guidelines and Annual Tests
Christopher P. Denton #SRUKAC18

2 Overview Evidence base for management of systemic sclerosis is progressing British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) develops guidelines to help professionals give high quality care and define best practice. Annual testing for heart, lung or other complications is recommended. The presentation will give summarise the BSR Systemic Sclerosis Guideline and best approaches for regular testing. #SRUKAC18

3 Level of evidence and grade of recommendation
IA Evidence from meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials IB Evidence from at least one randomized controlled trial IIA Evidence from at least one controlled study without randomization IIB Evidence from at least one other type of quasi-experimental study III Evidence from non-experimental descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, correlation studies, and case-control studies IV Evidence from expert committee reports or opinions or clinical experience of respected authorities, or both Grade of Recommendation: A Directly based on Level I evidence B Directly based on Level II evidence or extrapolated recommendations from Level I evidence C Directly based on Level III evidence or extrapolated recommendations from Level I or II evidence D Directly based on Level IV evidence or extrapolated recommendations from Level I, II, or III evidence Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles M, Grimshaw J.  Developing clinical guidelines. West J Med. 1999, 170:348-51

4 EULAR/EUSTAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis
I SSc-related digital vasculopathy (RP, digital ulcers) 1. Calcium channel blockers and iloprost for Raynaud’s 2. Intravenous prostanoids (in particular iloprost) should be considered for treatment of digital ulcers in SSc 3. Bosentan should be considered in SSc with multiple digital ulcers II SSc-PAH 4. Bosentan should be strongly considered to treat SSc-PAH 5. Sildenafil may be considered to treat SSc-PAH 6. Sitaxentan is withdrawn and should not be used for SSc-PAH 7. Intravenous epoprostenol should be considered for the treatment of severe SSc-PAH III SSc-related skin involvement 8. Methotrexate may be considered for treatment of skin manifestations of early diffuse SSc IV SSc-ILD 9. Cyclophosphamide should be considered for treatment of SSc-ILD V SRC 10. ACE inhibitors should be used in the treatment of SRC 11. Patients on steroids should be carefully monitored for SRC VI SSc-related gastrointestinal disease 12. PPI should be used for the treatment of SSc-related gastro-oesophageal reflux, 13. Prokinetic drugs should be used for the management of SSc-related symptomatic motility disturbances 14. When malabsorption is caused by bacterial overgrowth, antibiotics may be useful in SSc Kowal-Bielecka et al, Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:

5 EULAR/EUSTAR Recommendations for management of systemic sclerosis – updated 2016 (from 2009)
Updated EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc), using EULAR standard operating procedures. 16 recommendations were developed (instead of 14 in 2009) addressing: Raynaud's phenomenon (RP), digital ulcers (DUs) pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) skin and lung disease scleroderma renal crisis gastrointestinal involvement. 2016 changes include: phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors for the treatment of SSc-related RP and DUs, riociguat, updates for endothelin receptor antagonists, prostacyclin analogues and PDE-5 inhibitors for SSc-related PAH. New recommendations regarding the use of fluoxetine for SSc-related RP and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for selected patients with rapidly progressive SSc were also added. Kowal-Bielecka O et al. Update of EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheumatic Dis 2017; 76:

6 BSR and BHPR Standards, Guidelines and Audit Working Group.
The Scleroderma (Systemic Sclerosis) guideline …. 36 months in development Denton CP, Hughes M, Gak N, Vila J, Buch MH, Chakravarty K, Fligelstone K, Gompels LL, Griffiths B, Herrick AL, Pang J, Parker L, Redmond A, van Laar J, Warburton L, Ong VH BSR and BHPR Standards, Guidelines and Audit Working Group. Submitted January 11th 2016 Accepted April 12th 2016 Published May 2016

7 BSR and BHPR guideline for the management of systemic sclerosis
Work started September 2012 February submitted to BSR and first stage of external peer review – presented draft April 2015 Target for completion September 2015 Scope and structure of draft guideline General approach to SSc management Key therapies and treatment of organ based disease Service organization and delivery within NHS England #SRUKAC18

8 Overview of management of systemic sclerosis
dcSSc Therapy: Vascular Identification and treatment of severe organ-based complications Immunosuppressive SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS Overlap SSc Manage according to severity and activity of overlap features – arthritis, myositis, lupus Management of common morbidity Raynaud’s, upper GI, anorectal disease, erectile dysfunction, calcinosis, telangiectasia Therapy of major Organ-based complications lcSSc Denton et al, Rheumatology 2016;55:

9 Overview of major SSc complications
Digital vasculopathy Gastrointestinal Lung fibrosis Pulmonary hypertension UIP NSIP Figure 4. Overview of major SSc complications Clinical and pathological or radiological features of the key organ based complications of systemic sclerosis are shown on this figure including GI involvement, lung fibrosis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, cardiac fibrosis, myositis, calcinosis and severe digital ischaemia. Lung fibrosis may have a UIP pattern or more often NSIP. Pulmonary hypertension may be identified by enlargement of the pulmonary arterial trunk relative to the aorta and if lung fibrosis is absent is more likely to reflect PAH. Digital vasculopathy may lead to ulceration, gangrene and amputation in severe cases. Specific complications shown include digital ulceration (a), dry gangrene (b), auto amputation (c) intestinal pseudo-obstruction (d), gastric antral vascular ectasia (e), lung fibrosis with a UIP (f) or NSIP (g) appearance on HRCT, pulmonary arterial hypertension shown histologically (h) or on CT (i), cardiac fibrosis (j), scleroderma renal crisis (k), digital contractures (l), calcinosis (m) and acro-osteolysis (n). These individual complications are described in the text. Cardiac Renal Musculoskeletal Calcinosis Acro-osteolysis Denton and Khanna, Lancet 2017, 390:

10 Improving survival in systemic sclerosis: a historical perspective
lcSSc 12 24 36 48 60 50 70 80 90 100 93% 91% P=0.534 Disease duration (months) Survival (%) Disease onset n=234 n=286 84% 69% P=0.018 dcSSc Nihtyanova et al, QJM 2010; 103:109-15

11 Pro-active screening for cardiorespiratory complications uncovers increased burden of systemic sclerosis and permits earlier intervention Nihtyanova et al, QJM 2010; 103:109-15

12 Screening for internal organ involvement in Systemic sclerosis
Baseline and regular follow-up assessment to be considered yearly for systemic sclerosis patients Pulmonary hypertension Echo with Doppler every year PFT/DLCO yearly DETECT algorithm if eligible RHC to confirm PAH if suspected Lung fibrosis Gastro-intestinal and nutrition PFT with DLCO at baseline and every 4-6 months during first 3 years Consider HRCT of lungs Screening for internal organ involvement in Systemic sclerosis Symptom based investigations such as barium swallow, gastric emptying study and breath test Figure 3. Investigation strategy for systemic sclerosis Systematic investigation of newly diagnosed cases of SSc and during regular follow up is important to identify significant complications that may require management. This systematic approach allows proactive management and has been associated with improved overall survival in recently described cohorts of SSc. Renal Cardiac For anti-RNA pol III or early diffuse SSc BP monitoring 3 times a week Prednisone > 15 mg/day with caution Estimated creatinine clearance and urinalysis at regular interval Echo with Doppler every year ECG Troponin/BNP CMR if high risk Denton and Khanna, Lancet 2017, 390:

13 Part A: General approach to SSc management
Early recognition and diagnosis of dcSSc is a priority with referral to a specialist SSc centre (III, C) Patients with early dcSSc should be offered immunosuppression: MTX, MMF or intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) (III/C). D-penicillamine is not recommended (IIa/C) Autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) may be considered in some cases particularly where there is risk of severe organ involvement, balancing concerns about treatment toxicity (IIa/C) Skin involvement may be treated with either MTX (II,B) or MMF (III,C). Other options include CYC (III,C), oral steroid therapy (in as low a dose and with close monitoring of renal function; III,C) and possibly rituximab (III,C) Azathioprine or MMF should be considered after CYC to maintain improvement in skin sclerosis and/or lung function (III,C).

14 Part B. Key therapies and treatment of organ based disease
Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) and digital ulcers (DU) Lung fibrosis Pulmonary hypertension Gut disease Renal complications Cardiac disease Skin manifestations Calcinosis in SSc Musculoskeletal manifestations Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)

15 Recommendations for Raynaud’s phenomenon in systemic sclerosis
Although there is no evidence base to support ‘general measures’, most clinicians believe that patient education, specifically general/lifestyle measures including keeping warm, the avoidance of cold ambient environments and smoking cessation, are key aspects of management. Final consensus: 100%. First line treatments are calcium channel blockers (Ia,A) and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (Ib,C) Final consensus 100%. Other treatments that may be considered if these are either ineffective or not tolerated are: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, alpha-blockers and statin therapy (III,C) Final consensus 100%. Phosphodiesterase-type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors are being used increasingly for SSc-related RP (IIa,C). Intravenous prostanoid (e.g. iloprost) (Ia,B) and digital (palmar) sympathectomy (+/- botulinum toxin injection) should be considered in severe and/or refractory cases (III,D) Final consensus 100%.

16 Treatment and prevention of digital vascular disease in SSc
Parenteral prostacyclin Bosentan PDE5 inhibitors Angiotensin axis (ACEi) ARB Statin Antithrombotic therapy Clopidogrel, aspirin LMW heparin Surgical approaches Radical microarteriolysis Botulinum toxin injection Raynaud’s therapy Oral vasodilators, SSRI Topical GTN microemulsion, Lessons from pulmonary hypertension

17 NHS England policy for DU in SSc*
Sildenafil Prostenoids (iloprost) Bosentan access for severe cases Severe refractory disease: persistent or progressive ulceration of one or more digits causing or threatening tissue loss despite optimal treatment with vasodilators including IV prostanoids and oral sildenafil, or Multiple DUs: 3 or more DUs either currently or occurring in the last 12 months despite IV prostanoids and sildenafil. Challenging process (18 months) with reduced access during development compared with previous arrangements (IFR) *First published: January 2015 Prepared by NHS England Specialised Services Clinical Reference Group for Specialised Rheumatology Published by NHS England, in electronic format only.

18 Pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis
10-year incidence of pulmonary hypertension in RFH cohort PAH-SSc (mPAP > 25 mm Hg; PAWP ≤ 15 mm Hg, no major PF) All pulmonary hypertension (PH-SSc) (mPAP > 25 mm Hg) Figure 1. Cumulative frequency of pulmonary hypertension (PH-SSc) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH-SSc) in an actively screened systemic sclerosis cohort In this cohort of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients undergoing routine annual screening cases were referred for diagnostic right heart catherization (RHC) based on standard screening thresholds or clinical suspicion of PH. Approximately 1-2% of cases per year of long term follow up develop PH (A). The majority of these cases are PAH-SSc, with this classification being more frequent in cases of lcSSc (B). Nihtyanova, Denton et al Arthritis Rheumatol 2014 ;66:

19 Licensed targeted therapies for PAH in systemic sclerosis
Endothelin receptor antagonists Nitric oxide pathway stimulants Prostacyclin analogues i.v., s.c., inh. p.o. p.o. Bosentan* (approved 2001) Ambrisentan Sitaxentan (withdrawn) Macitentan (approved 2013) Sildenafil (approved 2005) Tadalafil Riociguat – guanylate cyclase agonist (approved 2013) Epoprostenol Treprostinil Iloprost Selexipag (approved 2015) Beraprost NO cGMP Mechanism ET1 PGI2

20 Improved survival for scleroderma associated pulmonary arterial hypertension
Retrospective cohort analysis of the RFH PAH-SSc registry Long term morbidity-mortality benefit from combination PAH therapy N Engl J Med 2013 Eur Respir J 2014 ARD 2015 n = 1156 29% CTD-PAH 33% baseline ERA plus PDE5i Selexipag Placebo Sitbon et al, N Engl J Med. 2015 P<0.001 Hazard ratio Macitentan Ambrisentan + Tadalafil 100 80 60 40 20 12 24 36 48 Time (months) Survival (%) Conventional therapy bosentan PAH-SSc n=45 n=47 81% 68% 74% 47% p = 0.016 Bosentan – non-selective endothelin receptor antagonist Approved in 2001 Supportive therapy and intravenous prostacyclin for severe disease Williams MH, et al. Heart 2006; 92:

21 Recommendation for autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in systemic sclerosis:
Current evidence support the use of HSCT in poor prognosis diffuse SSc that does not have severe internal organ manifestations that render the treatment highly toxic (Ib, B) Final consensus 80%. Definitive statements regarding relative safety and efficacy compared with other immunosuppressive strategies and definition of appropriate cases for HSCT will require further data (III,C) Final consensus 90%.

22 Part C. Service organization and delivery within NHS
SSc must be managed within an integrated system of primary, secondary and tertiary level care. In secondary care it is important to have a specialised multi-disciplinary team Care should be delivered as close to a patient’s home as possible but include the essential level of SSc expertise. Education, clinical nurse specialist-led clinic for rapid access and availability of telephone helplines form part of a recommended template for high quality SSc care. Additional support should also be offered through liaison with patient-based organisations such as Scleroderma and Raynaud’s UK.

23 Organisation of 21st Century Scleroderma Care – an integrated multi-specialist network
Stakeholders Patient organisations SRUK FESCA NHS England Specialist Rheumatology CRG UKSSG EUSTAR SCTC WSF BSR AR UK Industry partners National Pulmonary Hypertension Centre Patient flows Primary care Rheumatologist Dermatologist Physicain Medical specialist Cardiology Pulmonology UK Specialist Scleroderma Centre shared care model Gastro-enterology Nephrology Haemato-oncology Dermatology Surgery Plastic Orthopaedics GI Multi disciplinary clinical service Research Biobank Training Basic science Trials Clinical projects, outcomes and processes

24 Many thanks to …. Our patients The “Scleroderma team” at Royal Free
Research Funders Colleagues in many institutions and organisations UKSSG colleagues International collaborators – EUSTAR, WSF, SCTC and FESCA Arthritis Research Campaign (UK), Raynaud’s and Scleroderma Association (UK), Wellcome Trust (UK), Nuffield Foundation (UK), Scleroderma Society (UK), Rosetrees Trust, Scleroderma Research Foundation (USA), MRC, EULAR, Royal Free Charity


Download ppt "BSR Guidelines and Annual Tests"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google