1. Philosophical Chairs

2. Objective
Philosophical Chairs is similar to a debate. Students are given a central topic or question and must choose whether they agree or disagree and defend their position.
In theory, learning happens when students use critical thinking to resolve subsequent conflicts which arise when presented with alternative perspectives, ideas, or contradictions to what they have previously learned or believed. Philosophical Chairs is a technique to allow students to critically think, verbally ponder, and logically write their beliefs.

3. Preparing for the Discussion
Research the issue by reading articles that present arguments FOR and AGAINST the issue. You will find many helpful resources here:
Record notes from both articles on the Philosophical Chairs T-Chart.
Decide whether you are FOR or AGAINST the issue.

4. The Set-up
AGAINST
FOR

5. Directions You must decide whether you are FOR or AGAINST the issue
Sit on the side of the room labeled FOR or AGAINST
A neutral mediator stands in between the groups
Asks for volunteers to speak and/or calls on sides to speak
Can limit time
Makes sure everyone who wants to speak has the opportunity
Can call on anyone at anytime to speak. Be prepared!

6. Rules You must choose a side. You cannot be neutral.
Listen while others speak and try to understand the person’s point of view.
Contribute your own thoughts, offering your reasons as succinctly as possible.
Either volunteer or wait for the mediator to call on you to speak. Use the notes from the Philosophical Chairs T-Chart to support your position.
In one sentence, summarize the previous speaker’s argument before you respond.

7. Rules (Continued)
If you have already spoken, wait for three other people on your side to speak before you speak again.
Address ideas, not the person stating the ideas.
Keep an open mind. Move to the other side if you feel someone has made a good argument or your opinion swayed.
Reflect on the experience via the evaluation form at the end.

8. Statements for Discussion
Euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide should be legal.
Euthanasia should only be allowed for the terminally ill.
Euthanasia is acceptable for severely ill infants.
Legalizing euthanasia would destroy patient trust in the medical profession.
Legalizing euthanasia would save money for the American healthcare system.
The government should not be involved in patients’ end-of-life decision-making.

9. TOTAL:________/100 points possible
Rubric
T-Chart notes are detailed, address arguments both FOR and AGAINST, and demonstrate effective research.
________/30 points possible
Participation in Philosophical Chairs discussion is voluntary, demonstrates respect of others’ opinions, uses meaningful arguments and specific examples.
________/40 points possible
Philosophical Chairs Follow-up Report is detailed and demonstrates thoughtful reflection. ________/30 points possible
TOTAL:________/100 points possible