Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Partnership Performance Monitoring
2
Approaches to evaluating partnership
How well is the partnership working? How good is my organization at partnering?
3
Generally clear consensus across instruments about important characteristics
Trust, mutual benefit, accessible, dependable, good communication, mutual benefit, open, provides accurate information, engages in relationship building, responsible, shares power, supportive, truthful, values differences
4
Proposed instrument 13 statements that would be rated on a 5-point scale Focused on department performance, not individual performance
5
Nuts and bolts of operation
Administration Analysis
6
Nuts and bolts: Administration
Online survey links will be created for surveys for each department. Each department should identify at least 8 key community partners and their primary contact by ________. Completely possible that a department may work with the same community organization, however likely that the contact will be different. For example, USD 497 – school nurses vs. PE coordinators Lists will be sorted randomly. Each quarter the survey will be sent to 2 community partners for each department. Follow-up s will be sent to assure completion. At no time will department staff be provided with individual responses from partners.
7
Nuts and bolts: Analysis
Each survey will be scored with a maximum of 65 points. The two surveys from each quarter will be scored, and then averaged. This will be the quarterly score. The overall score reported in the PM reporting will be a rolling average of the four quarters.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.