Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Christophe Herkenne, Aarti Naik, Yogeshvar N

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Christophe Herkenne, Aarti Naik, Yogeshvar N"— Presentation transcript:

1 Ibuprofen Transport into and through Skin from Topical Formulations: In Vitro–In Vivo Comparison 
Christophe Herkenne, Aarti Naik, Yogeshvar N. Kalia, Jonathan Hadgraft, Richard H. Guy  Journal of Investigative Dermatology  Volume 127, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007) DOI: /sj.jid Copyright © 2007 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

2 Figure 1 Ibuprofen concentration profiles across SC in vivo. In vivo concentration versus normalized SC depth (x/L) profiles of ibuprofen following 30minutes treatment with Artofen, Brufen, Iprogel, and Optifen gels. Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , DOI: ( /sj.jid ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

3 Figure 2 Ibuprofen transport across a silicone membrane in vitro. Steady-state flux of ibuprofen through a silicone membrane of 120μm thickness (mean±SD, n=4). Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , DOI: ( /sj.jid ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

4 Figure 3 Ibuprofen transport across excised porcine skin in vitro. Cumulative permeation of ibuprofen from four gels through dermatomed pig ear skin (mean±SD, n=7–9). Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , DOI: ( /sj.jid ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

5 Figure 4 Relative fluxes of drug across silicone and porcine skin membranes in vitro. Comparison of the average (n=4–9) in vitro steady-state fluxes of ibuprofen from various formulations across silicone membrane and dermatomed pig ear skin. Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , DOI: ( /sj.jid ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

6 Figure 5 Ibuprofen fluxes across porcine (in vitro) and human (in vivo) skin. In vivo (open bars)–in vitro (hatched bars) comparison of the steady-state flux (mean±SD, n=4–9). Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , DOI: ( /sj.jid ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

7 Figure 6 Ibuprofen diffusivity parameters through porcine (in vitro) and human (in vivo) skin. In vivo (open bars)–in vitro (hatched bars) comparison of the deduced diffusion parameter (mean±SD, n=4–9). Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , DOI: ( /sj.jid ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

8 Figure 7 Ibuprofen partition coefficients into porcine (in vitro) and human (in vivo) skin. In vivo (open bars)–in vitro (hatched bars) comparison of the deduced K values (mean±SD, n=4–9). Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , DOI: ( /sj.jid ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

9 Figure 8 Device for determination of silicone membrane – gel partition coefficients. Determination of the silicone–gel partition coefficient. Membranes were equilibrated with each gel (n=3) for 48hours. Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , DOI: ( /sj.jid ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Christophe Herkenne, Aarti Naik, Yogeshvar N"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google