1. Mon., Oct. 22

2. purposes served by a complaint (and answer)

3. can pleading standards be used to weed out factual allegations without adequate evidentiary support before discovery/trial?

4. modern approach: notice pleading

5. -. Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading (a) Claim for Relief
- Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading (a) Claim for Relief. A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain: … (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; …

6. why have this system?

7. pleading special matters (fraud)

8. Rule 9. Pleading Special Matters
Rule 9.  Pleading Special Matters  ...  (b) Fraud or Mistake; Conditions of Mind. In alleging fraud or mistake, a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake. Malice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person’s mind may be alleged generally.

9. Why the heightened pleading standards for fraud?

10. fraud - statement (omission if duty to speak) - of material fact
- that is false (or misleading)
- with knowledge of falsity
often intent that plaintiff rely
- reasonable reliance on statement by plaintiff
- causation of damages

11. Does R 9(b) apply to affirmative defenses?

12. Why the exception in 9(b) for scienter?

13. distinguish two types of challenges of the plaintiff’s complaint

14. 1 really about failure to state a claim - D is not claiming that the P does not have evidentiary support for the allegations - D is worried that what is alleged does not add up to a violation of the law (some element of a cause of action looks like it is missing)

15. for example…. assume that under the relevant law there is no strict liability for product defects, only negligence liability P alleges that D manufactured the product “improperly”

16. this is addressed by Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 (1957)

17. Conley v. Gibson “complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief”

18. 2 not really about failure to state a claim - D thinks P does not have evidentiary support for the allegations - all the elements for a cause of action are there but the D thinks that P will not be able to prove an element (that is why the P lacks specificity)

19. assume that under the relevant law there is no strict liability for product defects, only negligence liability P alleges that D manufactured the product “negligently” without saying how it was negligent

20. before 2007 this was solely a matter to be dealt with through discovery-Rule 11-summary judgment now…

21. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (U.S. 2007)

22. did the plaintiffs fail to state a claim?

23. Defendant Henry Taylor intentionally engaged in contact with the person of Plaintiff Michael Green that was harmful or offensive, causing damages.

24. Paragraph 4 Plaintiffs allege that Defendants entered into a contract, combination or conspiracy to prevent competitive entry in their respective local telephone and/or high speed internet services markets by, among other things, agreeing not to compete with one another and to stifle attempts by others to compete with them and otherwise allocating customers and markets to one another.

25. Paragraph 51 “In the absence of any meaningful competition between the [baby bells] in one another’s markets, and in light of the parallel course of conduct that each engaged in to prevent competition from [locals] within their respective local telephone and/or high speed internet services markets and the other facts and market circumstances alleged above, Plaintiffs allege upon information and belief that Defendants have entered into a contract, combination or conspiracy to prevent entry in their respective local telephone and/or high speed internet service markets and have agreed not to compete with one another and otherwise allocated customers and markets to one another.”

26. Stevens’s dissent: But the plaintiffs allege in three places in their complaint, ¶¶ 4, 51, 64, App. 11, 27, 30, that the [baby bells] did in fact agree both to prevent competitors from entering into their local markets and to forgo competition with each other. And as the Court recognizes, at the motion to dismiss stage, a judge assumes “that all the allegations in the complaint are true (even if doubtful in fact).”

27. The majority circumvents this obvious obstacle to dismissal by pretending that it does not exist. The Court admits that “in form a few stray statements in the complaint speak directly of agreement,” but disregards those allegations by saying that “on fair reading these are merely legal conclusions resting on the prior allegations” of parallel conduct. Ante, at The Court's dichotomy between factual allegations and “legal conclusions” is the stuff of a bygone era, supra, at

28. what 8(a)(2) violated then?

29. were the defendants not put on notice about the nature of the alleged agreement?

30. how can an agreement in restraint of trade arise
how can an agreement in restraint of trade arise? must there always be a “handshake”?

31. were the defendants put on notice…?

32. the real problem is evidentiary support…

33. how do you show a tacit agreement?

34. imagine that there was a trial and all that the Ps offered for evidence of an agreement was this parallel behavior? what result?

35. Souter: Asking for plausible grounds to infer an agreement does not impose a probability requirement at the pleading stage; it simply calls for enough fact to raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of illegal agreement.

36. does Twombly frustrate other purposes of a complaint?

37. does the SCt have the power to do this?

38. 28 U.S.C. § Rules of procedure and evidence; power to prescribe (a) The Supreme Court shall have the power to prescribe general rules of practice and procedure and rules of evidence for cases in the United States district courts (including proceedings before magistrate judges thereof) and courts of appeals

39. Aschcroft v. Iqbal (U.S. 2009)

40. cause of action?

41. does Iqbal state a claim?

42. are the defendants put on notice about the subject matter of the suit?

43. what is wrong with the complaint then?

44. what should Iqbal have put in his complaint?

45. how does the Iqbal court justify the plausibility standard, given the language of R 8(a)(2)?

46. -. Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading (a) Claim for Relief
- Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading (a) Claim for Relief. A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain: … (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; …

47. Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for relief will, as the Court of Appeals observed, be a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense. But where the well-pleaded facts do not permit the court to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct, the complaint has alleged—but it has not “show[n]”—“that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 8(a)(2).

48. is there an other way of weeding out frivolous complaints before discovery without using heightened pleading standards?

49. what allegations does Twiqbal apply to?

50. allegations of jurisdiction?

51. Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading (a) Claim for Relief
Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading (a) Claim for Relief. A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain: (1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction, unless the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new jurisdictional support; (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and (3) a demand for the relief sought, which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief.

52. - P sues D for negligence in federal court - In his answer, D adds a counterclaim asking for the damages that D sustained due to P’s negligence in the same accident - Do the standards in Twiqbal apply to the allegations of P’s negligence in the counterclaim?

53. Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading (a) Claim for Relief
Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading (a) Claim for Relief. A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain: (1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction, unless the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new jurisdictional support; (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and (3) a demand for the relief sought, which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief.

54. - P sues D for negligence in federal court - In his answer, D introduces the defense of contributory negligence - Do the standards in Twiqbal apply to the allegations of P’s negligence in the affirmative defense?

55. Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading (b) Defenses; Admissions and Denials
Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading (b) Defenses; Admissions and Denials.     (1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:         (A) state in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and         (B) admit or deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party.

56. compare Rule 9(b) – does it apply to affirmative defenses?

57. Rule 9. Pleading Special Matters
Rule 9.  Pleading Special Matters  ...  (b) Fraud or Mistake; Conditions of Mind. In alleging fraud or mistake, a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake. Malice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person’s mind may be alleged generally.

58. Over the period of June 30, 2016 to September 26, 2017 Defendant Henry Taylor operated a moon base which emitted mind rays directed at Plaintiff Michael Green, allowing Defendant to read Plaintiff’s thoughts and causing Plaintiff to experience severe headaches and ringing in the ears.

59. how to plead to satisfy Twiqbal…