Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Evaluating the Principal Clinical Experience: A Progress Report

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Evaluating the Principal Clinical Experience: A Progress Report"— Presentation transcript:

1 Evaluating the Principal Clinical Experience: A Progress Report
Ed Krupat, PhD Medical Education Grand Rounds May 18, 2007

2 The PCE Pilots Cambridge Integrated Clerkship--begun July 2004
Brigham & Women’s Hospital--begun July 2005 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center--begun July 2005 Massachusetts General Hospital--begun July 2006

3 The Principles Longitudinality Mentoring
with faculty and house staff with patients of feedback of curriculum Mentoring Interdisciplinary perspectives Integration of basic and clinical sciences Patient-centered approach Student-centered learning

4 Plans & Methods Mentoring programs Planned curriculum
Tutorials Students present cases PCC (with physicians who admit to the hospital) PD III at site Writing/reflection

5 The Evaluation Plan Comprehensive Multi-method Scientifically rigorous
Experiences Knowledge & knowledge retention Skills Attitudes/perceptions Self-assessment Multi-method Quantitative Qualitative Scientifically rigorous Tied directly to pilot program goals

6 The Design Comparison/control group recruited from students doing traditional rotations Pre-clerkship measures demonstrated no differences on MCAT scores Step I scores PD II OSCE scores Career preferences Attitudes toward patient care

7 Characterizing the Experience

8 “How well would you say the following adjectives describe your clerkship experience: Frustrating” (1= Not At All & 6= Perfectly) ’05-’06 Clerkships

9 “How well would you say the following adjectives describe your clerkship experience: Confidence-building” (1= Not At All & 6= Perfectly) ’05-’06 Clerkships

10 “How well would you say the following adjectives describe your clerkship experience: Humanizing”
’05-’06 Clerkships

11 “How satisfied are you with: The overall quality of your clerkship experience” (1= Extremely Dissatisfied & 6= Extremely Satisfied) ’05-’06 Clerkships

12 Performance: Knowledge

13 Shelf Scores: CIC vs. Control Year 1 (2004-2005)
T-Test P-Value Ob/Gyn 77.13 70.40 .250 Pediatrics 76.25 74.22 .689 Psychiatry 81.25 70.60 .128 Surgery 77.38 73.20 .424

14 Shelf Exam

15 Shelf Exam

16 Shelf Exam

17 Shelf Exam

18 Performance: Skills

19 Comprehensive OSCE

20 Comprehensive OSCE

21 Comprehensive OSCE

22 Comprehensive OSCE Skill Score History
’05-’06 Clerkships

23 Comprehensive OSCE Skill Score Physical Exam
’05-’06 Clerkships

24 Attitudes & Perceptions about the Year

25 “To what extent have your experiences prepared you: To have the knowledge base necessary to be a competent practitioner” (1= Very Poorly & 6= Very Well) ’05-’06 Clerkships

26 “To what extent have your experiences prepared you: To integrate basic sciences and clinical practice” (1= Very Poorly & 6= Very Well) ’05-’06 Clerkships

27 “To what extent have your experiences prepared you: To practice evidence-based medicine” (1= Very Poorly & 6= Very Well) ’05-’06 Clerkships

28 “To what extent have your experiences prepared you: To see how the social context affects patients and their problems” (1= Very Poorly & 6= Very Well) ’05-’06 Clerkships

29 “To what extent have your experiences prepared you: To relate well to a diverse patient population” (1= Very Poorly & 6= Very Well) ’05-’06 Clerkships

30 “To what extent have your experiences prepared you: To know your strengths and limitations” (1= Very Poorly & 6= Very Well) ’05-’06 Clerkships

31 Attitudes & Perceptions about Patient Care and Life on the Wards

32 Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS)
’05-’06 Clerkships

33 Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS)
Pre Post Fall ’05 Spring ‘06 Site Site Site Control

34 “During this past clerkship year, I observed residents encouraging patients’ participation in their own care.” (1= Never & 7= Always) ’05-’06 Clerkships

35 “Your team is rounding on a patient in his hospital room when one of the consulting services arrives for the patient. Your attending and the consulting attending proceed to talk about the patient’s case as if the patient weren’t there.” (1= Very Often & 5= Never) ’05-’06 Clerkships

36 “In general, when I made an effort to develop rapport with my patients, my instructors _____ me.” (1= Completely Discouraged & 7= Completely Encouraged) ’05-’06 Clerkships

37 “In general, when I made an effort to get to know patients as unique persons, my instructors _____ me.” (1= Completely Discouraged & 7= Completely Encouraged) ’05-’06 Clerkships

38 Focus Group Findings Valued-added for the PCE students
Continuity with faculty Access to hearing how faculty think about clinical issues Mentoring Peer group support Sense of belonging to something larger than self

39 “Today I was in a public restroom at _____,and I noticed how there was paper all over the floor. For a moment I was disgusted and I thought about all the residents and physicians who work so hard to give top notch care. I wouldn’t want patients or their families to use the bathroom at ____ and feel this hospital is dirty when hospitals are supposed to be clean! So I picked up all the trash. At that moment, I realized that I had taken ownership of this hospital.”

40 Value-Added for the Faculty
Contact and meaningful cross-discipline discussion Ability to get to know students well Personally satisfying Ability to identify strengths and weaknesses Ability to provide feedback and assist in student growth and development

41 Remaining Challenges Paradox of the Pullout
Longitudinal, interdiscipinary curriculum Attendings vs residents?? More observation & better feedback

42 Challenges (cont.) Patient contact pre-workup
Longitudinal contact with patients Quality of the individual clerkships Consistency Across disciplines within site, within discipline across sites, and across PCEs

43


Download ppt "Evaluating the Principal Clinical Experience: A Progress Report"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google