Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Andrade Quick Notes.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Andrade Quick Notes."— Presentation transcript:

1 Andrade Quick Notes

2 Background People daydream when something is boring. Arguments about whether doodling takes away resources or maintains arousal

3 Aim To test whether doodling aids concentration in a boring task

4 Method and Design Lab experiment Independent groups
Counterbalanced for order effects

5 Variables IV-doodling condition or control condition
DV-Monitored information correct, incidental information correct Also measured: Total number of shapes shaded.

6 Participants 40 participants from Univ. of Plymouth (UK) Aged 18-55
Mostly Female Randomly assigned to condition

7 Sampling technique Opportunity sample (were recruited and volunteered, but for different study)

8 Procedure 1. Placed into IV groups
2. Participants in doodling condition asked to shade shapes on A4 paper 3. Control given piece of lined paper and pencil 4. Led to quiet room and tested individually. 5. Misled to believe it doesn’t matter if they remember. 6. Doodlers told that it doesn’t matter how well they shaded. minute tape, wrote down names 8. Sheet collected and they were talked to 9. Asked to recall names then places, or places than names

9 Data Type Quantitative

10 Apparatus Mock telephone message and cassette recorder
Shape sheet-10 per row-alternated squares and circles Lined paper for control group

11 Main Findings Condition Average number of correct names written down
Number of false alarms Doodling 7.8 (SD=0.4) 1 Control 7.1 (SD=1.1) 5

12 Conclusions Participants who performed shading task concentrated better than those with no concurrent task.

13 Strengths Reliability-standardized procedures
Validity-Control for extraneous variables Application-directly applies to school life and can be stretched to other realms as well Ethics-No real harm done to participants

14 Weaknesses Generalizability-small sample taken from original volunteers Validity-Independent groups – possibly participant variables Ethics-Some deception, though debriefed

15 Ecological Validity Low due to lab experiment

16 Ethics DR DICH Deception-yes RTW-yes Debriefing-yes
Informed consent-sort of Confidentiality-Yes Protection from harm-yes

17 Usefulness School, work, etc…

18 Relationship to approach
Memory and recall

19 Relationship to Psych Issue
Individual vs situational Strategy might work differently for different people But evidence shows that overall positive effect


Download ppt "Andrade Quick Notes."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google