Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWilla Long Modified over 6 years ago
1
Alex Gianninas December 3rd, 2013 UNT Physics Colloquium
Gravitational Waves and Underluminous Supernovae Explosions from ELM White Dwarfs Alex Gianninas December 3rd, 2013 UNT Physics Colloquium
2
Collaborators University of Oklahoma
Mukremin Kilic, Sara Barber, Paul Canton Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Warren Brown, Scott Kenyon University of Warwick JJ Hermes Université de Montréal Patrick Dufour, Pierre Bergeron 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
3
White Dwarf Properties
M ~ 0.6 M R ~ 0.01 R ~ 1 R ~ 106 log g ~ 8.0 (log g = 4.4) Teff ~ 150,000 3000 K No H burning WDs cool over several Gyrs 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
4
Internal Structure of WDs
He C/O H He Non-DA (DO, DB, DQ, DZ) C/O C/O DA Hot DQ 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
5
Gianninas et al. (2011) Binary Evolution 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
6
Many will merge in less than a Hubble time!
These “friends” are binary companions that stripped a significant amount of material from the progenitor, preventing the ignition of He burning, giving birth to an extremely low mass (ELM) WD ELM WDs are found almost exclusively in short-period binaries (P < 1 day) Many will merge in less than a Hubble time! 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
7
Internal Structure of WDs
H H He He C/O DA ELM DA 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
8
ELM Survey Targeted search for Extremely Low Mass WDs M < 0.25 M
Motivation: Progenitors of Type Ia supernovae Progenitors of underluminous supernovae (.Ia, Bildsten et al. 2007) Progenitors of AM CVn systems (Kilic et al., 2013) Pulsar companions Nearest systems are important sources of gravitational waves 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
9
ELM Survey: Target Selection
Hypervelocity Survey (Warren Brown, SAO): search for B type stars leaving the Galaxy, colors similar to ELM WDs 15% of targets are in fact ELM WDs Spectroscopy from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) SDSS colors (u-g, g-r) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
10
ELM Survey: Target Selection
Brown et al. (2010) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
11
ELM Survey: Target Selection
Brown et al. (2012) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
12
ELM Survey: Observations
MMT (6.5m), FLWO (1.5m), KPNO 4m Radial velocity follow-up to confirm the binary nature of each candidate Once confirmed, we seek to improve our orbital solution by better sampling all phases of the orbit 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
13
ELM Survey: Success Rate
Paper ELM WD Merger Systems Brown et al. (2010) I 12 6 Kilic et al. (2011) II 4 2 Brown et al. (2012) III 7 Kilic et al. (2012) IV 5 Brown et al. (2013) V 17 Before ELM Survey: Only 6 known merger systems Shortest known period is P = 1.5 hr ELM Survey has found 8 systems with P < 1.5 hr and 3 with P < 1 hr 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
14
Orbital solutions provide period (P) and velocity semi-amplitude (K)
Brown et al. (2013) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
15
Orbital Parameters Mass Function Lower limit on M2
Merger time Upper limit on 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
16
ELM Survey: Results Super-Chandrasekhar mass systems not necessarily Type Ia progenitors Mass ratio is important M systems → Stable mass transfer system (AM CVn, .Ia SN) Can be WD+NS binaries Brown et al. (2013) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
17
Progenitors of AM CVn (cataclysmic variables, novae)
Massive Companion Pulsars? No detections with Chandra Will undergo stable mass transfer Result: AM CVn Kilic et al. (2013) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
18
Masses & Radii Model dependent and model independent measurements
Model dependent: two ingredients Precise measurements of the atmospheric parameters (Teff and log g) Evolutionary models Model independent: Eclipses Ellipsoidal variations (tidal distortion) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
19
Hydrogen Balmer lines (model spectra)
2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
20
Spectroscopic Fits 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
21
New Model Atmospheres New regime in surface gravity (log g < 7.0)
New grid of models (down to log g = 4.5) computed with the atmosphere code of P. Bergeron (UdeM) Need to include higher Balmer lines (up to H12) in the fits since lines are still present in WDs with log g < 7.0 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
22
2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
23
Latest Evolutionary Models
H-shell flash Althaus et al. (2013) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
24
Evolutionary Models Statistical approach to calculate masses and ages
Mean weighted by the time spent at each point in Teff - log g plane Still much uncertainty 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium Althaus et al. (2013)
25
Results for ELM sample ∆ Pulsating □ Non-pulsating 2/17/2019
UNT Colloquium
26
ZZ Ceti Instability Strip
Non-Pulsating Pulsating 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
27
Results for ELM sample ∆ Pulsating □ Non-pulsating 2/17/2019
UNT Colloquium
28
1st Pulsating ELM WD: J1840 Hermes et al. (2012) 2/17/2019
UNT Colloquium
29
J1112 et J1518 Hermes et al. (2012) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
30
J1614 et J2228 Hermes et al. (2013) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
31
Pulsating ELM WDs Currently 5 known pulsating ELM WDs
Van Grootel et al. (2013): first exploration of pulsations models appropriate for ELM WDs Equivalent properties to ZZ Ceti stars at lower mass Additional evidence that these are indeed bona fide WDs 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
32
Extended Instability Strip
Van Grootel et al. (2013) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
33
Results for ELM sample ∆ Pulsating □ Non-pulsating Ca lines He lines
2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
34
2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
35
ALL ELM WDs with log g < 6.0 have Ca lines!
2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
36
Ca abundances 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
37
He abundances 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
38
J (J0745) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
39
J0745 : A whole lot of metals! Gianninas et al. (2013, submitted)
2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
40
J0745: An Extreme DAZ ELM WD Teff = 8380 K log g = 6.21 Abundances
log Ca/H = -5.8 log Mg/H = -3.9 log Cr/H = -6.1 log Ti/H = -5.6 log Fe/H = -4.5 All nearly solar! Gianninas et al. (2013, submitted) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
41
Origin of metals For more massive DAZ WDs circumstellar debris disks… circumbinary disks for ELM WDs? Radiative levitation? Recent H-shell flash? Optically thick Dotted i = 30° Dashed-dotted i = 60° Rin = 1.3 R Rout = 1.4 – 5.0 R 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
42
PSR J1816+4510 Kaplan et al. (2013) ELM WD pulsar companion
Teff = 16,000 K log g = 4.90 Hypothesis: result of a recent H-shell flash 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
43
HST (COS) Yes! 10 orbits Keck (HIRES) TBD… 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
44
2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
45
J065133.34+284423.4 (J0651) ‘‘Poster child” for ELM WDs
Shortest period ELM WD binary P = min! Eclipsing! After initial discovery, photometric follow-up at McDonald, APO, Gemini North and GTC 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
46
Direct detection of orbital decay!
Light Curves Direct detection of orbital decay! 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium Hermes et al. (2013)
47
O-C Diagram 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium Hermes et al. (2013)
48
J0651: Rotation Rate Isolated WDs : slow rotators ( < 10’s of km/s), measured with Ca line profile Evolution in compact binaries and interactions with companions could ELM WDs be fast rotators? Tidal forces synchronized orbits For J0651 = 200 km/s Berger et al. (2005) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
49
Rossiter-McLaughlin Effect
Winn et al. (2005) 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
50
Prediction Follow recipe from Winn et al. (2005)
1. Rotationally broaden line profile of primary to simulate integrated spectrum (S) 2. Unbroadened line profile, Doppler shifted to the red/blue (Sp) 3. Str = S - Sp 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
51
Magnitude of R-M Effect ~ 40 km/s
Prediction Magnitude of R-M Effect ~ 40 km/s 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
52
Keck Observations Awarded ½ night on Keck I with LRIS
Only telescope where we could obtain necessary S/N 5 - 7 spectra (t ~ 25s) per exposure to reduce number of times we read the CCD and ensure the best possible temporal sampling Needed to synchronize blue and red sides of instruments (different read times) 6 hours of observing = 313 spectra 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
53
Observations Keck : J0651 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
54
Observations Keck : J0651 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
55
Conclusions ELM Survey: targeted search for extremely low-mass WDs
Success: ~60 systems avec P < 1 day Observed Phenomena: Pulsations Metals Eclipses Orbital Decay Ellipsoidal Variations 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
56
More to come… ELM Survey Spectroscopic Analysis Spitzer J0745 J0651
Upcoming observing runs: MMT, KPNO 4m LAMOST? Southern Hemisphere? Spectroscopic Analysis Abundances Spitzer J0745 HST: December 6 and 7 Keck: TBD J0651 Finish data reduction and analysis 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
57
Fate of J0651? 2/17/2019 UNT Colloquium
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.