Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Decisions, Judgements, and Reasoning.
Cognitive Psychology Chapter 11 Decisions, Judgements, and Reasoning.
2
Formal logic and reasoning
Chapter 11.2 2/17/2019 Formal logic and reasoning Judgment Psychophysics Decisions I Physical and Symbolic distance Cognitive maps Algorithms & Heuristics Representiveness The hot hand debate Study Question. • What is the symbolic distance effect and why is it important in understanding the notion of representation?
3
Decisions Psychophysics
Psychophysics: an experimental approach that attempts to relate psychological experience to physical stimuli. Fechner and the difference threshold Just Noticeable Difference (JND). The smallest difference between two similar stimuli that can be distinguished.
4
Decisions Psychophysics
Absolute Threshold: The critical level of intensity that gives rise to sensation. Problems with determining the absolute threshold The radar operator example Bias versus sensitivity Signal detection theory Noise and noise plus signal E.g., Library noise and library noise plus a gunshot Library noise and library noise plus someone talking
5
Decisions Psychophysics Signal detection theory Sensitivity d }
Loudness Library noises Library noises plus someone talking Library noises plus a gunshot
6
Decisions Psychophysics Signal detection theory b
Response Bias: Criteria setting Brightness Radar noise radar noise plus signal Responds Does not responds b
7
Decisions Psychophysics Signal detection theory b
Response Bias: Lax criterion Brightness Radar noise radar noise plus signal Responds Does not responds b Correct rejection rate = 50 % Miss rate = 15 % Hit rate = 85 % False Alarm rate = 50 %
8
Decisions Psychophysics Signal detection theory
Response Bias: Lax criterion Actual Events Noise Signal+noise Receiver Operator Chooses Noise Signal Correct rejection Miss False Alarm 50% Hits 85%
9
Decisions Psychophysics Signal detection theory b
Response Bias: Strict criterion Brightness Radar noise radar noise plus signal Responds Does not responds b Correct rejection rate = 85 % Miss rate = 50 % Hit rate = 50 % False Alarm rate = 15 %
10
Decisions Psychophysics Signal detection theory
Response Bias: Lax criterion Actual Events Noise Signal+noise Receiver Operator Chooses Noise Signal Correct rejection Miss False Alarm 15% Hits 50%
11
Decisions Psychophysics Signal detection theory b
Memory operating characteristics Correct rejection rate = 85 % Miss rate = 50 % Hit rate = 50 % False Alarm rate = 50 % Familiarity New words Old words Responds Does not responds b
12
Decisions The symbolic distance effect
Distance (discriminability) effect: The greater the difference (or distance) between the two stimuli being compared, the faster the dexision that that they differ. Which line is longer? vs. Which dot is higher? vs.
13
Decisions The symbolic distance effect
Distance (discriminability) effect Distance Near Far RT
14
Decisions The symbolic distance effect
The Symbolic Distance (descriminability) effect: A distance (or discriminability) effect that is based on semantic or other long term memory knowledge. E.g., Symbolic imagery effects Which is larger a mouse or a horse? Which is larger a donkey or a horse? The effect mirrors (physical) distance effects I.e., RT is a log function of perceived size discrepancy
15
Decisions The symbolic distance effect
The semantic congruity effect. Decisions are faster when the dimension being judged matches or is congruent with the implied semantic dimension Which balloon is higher? Which balloon is lower? vs. Which yo-yo is higher? Which yo-yo is lower? vs.
16
Decisions The symbolic distance effect Semantic congruity effect RT
Position Balloon Yo-yo RT Lower Higher
17
Decisions The symbolic distance effect Banks et al. (1976)
Distance and congruity Number magnitude estimates Which is larger? or 2 vs. 1 or 5 vs or 9
18
Decisions The symbolic distance effect Judging geographical distances
Holyoak’s work People judge distances from their own perspective E.g., Which are further apart? Antigonish to Fredericton or Sault Ste. Marie to Thunder Bay
19
Decisions The symbolic distance effect Judging geographical distances
Semantic / propositional intrusions Which is further north, Edmundston, NB or Victoria, BC?
20
Decisions The symbolic distance effect Judging geographical distances
Which is further south: Detriot, MI, or Windsor, ON?
21
Decisions The symbolic distance effect Judging geographical distances
Which is further east: Florida or Chile?
22
Decisions The symbolic distance effect Judging geographical distances
Which is further south: Montréal or Paris?
23
Decisions The symbolic distance effect Judging geographical distances
Which is further west Reno or San Diego?
24
Decisions Algorithms and Heuristics
Reasoning under uncertainty: Inductive reasoning Algorithms: A specific rule or solution procedure that is guaranteed to furnish the correct answer if it is followed. E.g., finding a forgotten phone number Heuristics: A strategy or approach that works under some circumstances, but is not guaranteed to produce the correct answer. Kahneman and Tversky’s work Behavioural decision work Ups and downs of heuristics Cf., Visual illusions
25
Decisions Algorithms and Heuristics The representativeness heuristic
E.g., Flip a coin 6 times, which is more likely HHHHHH or HHTHTT Which lottery ticket is most likely to win the next 6-49? or The representativeness heuristic - samples are like the populations that they are pulled from. The representativeness heuristic leads to a number of decision biases
26
Decisions Algorithms and Heuristics The representativeness heuristic
The 649 Controversy (Wed, March 19, 2008) Too many second place winners? Prize Payouts Prize Matches Amount Winners 1st $3,500, 2nd 5 + Bonus $1, 3rd $2, 4th $ ,245 5th $ ,935 6th 2 + Bonus $ ,843 Lotto 6/49 - The winning numbers were…. Bonus 43
27
Decisions Algorithms and Heuristics The representativeness heuristic
The law of small numbers Who is more likely to have days where more than 60% of the births are male? St. Martha’s or the IWK? The Gambler’s fallacy Superbowl ‘09 coin flip • NFC had won 11 consecutive coin tosses -> NFC won the coin toss • Saints (NFC) won the coin toss for Super Bowl XLIV
28
Decisions Algorithms and Heuristics The representativeness heuristic
Ignoring base rates John: Truck driver or classics professor at Dalhousie? Cancer Screening example 1% of women at age forty who participate in routine screening have breast cancer. 80% of women with breast cancer will get positive results. 9.6% of women without breast cancer will also get positive results. A woman in this age group had a positive mammography in a routine screening. What is the probability that she actually has breast cancer? --> Baysian probabilities
29
Decisions Algorithms and Heuristics The representativeness heuristic
The birthday bet If you bet against the birthday bet, what is P(winning)? Person 2 -> 364/365 = .99 Person 3 cannot have the same birthday as 1 or 2 & Person 2 cannot have the same birthday as 1 Multiplicative Rule: The joint probability of two independent events is the product of their individual probabilities Person 3 -> 363/365 X .99 = .99 Person 4 -> 362/365 X .99 = .98 Person 5 -> 361/365 X .98 = .97 Person 6 -> 360/365 X .97 = .95
30
Decisions Algorithms and Heuristics The representativeness heuristic
The birthday bet Person 10 -> 356/365 X .90 = .88 Person 15 -> 351/365 X .77 = .75 Person 20 -> 346/365 X .62 = .59 Person 25 -> 341/365 X .46 = .43 Person 30 -> 336/365 X .32 = .29 Person 35 -> 331/365 X .21 = .19 Person 40 -> 326/365 X .12 = .11 Person 45 -> 321/365 X .07 = .06 Person 50 -> 316/365 X .03 = .03
31
Decisions Algorithms and Heuristics The representativeness heuristic
Misperception of random events Is the following a random sequence? (Gilovich, 1991) OXXXOXXXOXXOOOXOOXXOO “Maximally” indicative of randomness Same number of X’s and O’s Same number of X’s follow O’s as X’s following X’s (and vice versa) P(alteration) = .5 Most people expect P(alteration) =.7
32
Decisions Algorithms and Heuristics The representativeness heuristic
The hot hand in basketball Study 1: 100 fans completed survey 91 % : a player has a better chance of making a shot after hitting the last two or three, a lower chance of hitting a shot if they have missed the last two or three 68 % for free throws 85 % believed that it was important to pass the ball to someone who had just made several shots in row. Study 2: 76ers home games from season Conditional probabilities P(hit | 3 misses) P(hit | 2 misses) P(hit | 1 misses) P(hit) P(hit | 1 hit) P(hit | 2 hits) P(hit | 3 hits)) Julius Irving Andrew Tony Team
33
Decisions Algorithms and Heuristics The representativeness heuristic
The hot hand in basketball Study 3: Free throws
34
Decisions Algorithms and Heuristics The representativeness heuristic
The hot hand in basketball Study 4: Controlled shooting: Cornell varsity players Determined 50 % range Paid for hitting baskets and predicting hits and misses 14/26 had higher P(hit|miss) than P(hit|hit) P(hit | 3 misses) P(hit | 2 misses) P(hit | 1 misses) P(hit) P(hit | 1 hit) P(hit | 2 hits) P(hit | 3 hits)) Mean
35
Decisions Algorithms and Heuristics The representativeness heuristic
The hot hand in basketball Predicting: Bet either “high” (5 cents for a hit, lose 4 cents for a miss) Or “low” (2 cents for a hit, lose 1 cent for a miss) Shooters and observers bet Similar misconceptions (The clustering illusion) Winning streaks as team momentum Hitting slumps in baseball Shooter & shot Obs. & shot Shooter & last shot Obs. & last shot Correlation
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.