Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

update: August 2003 Gumpenstein M. GREIMEL, A. Pöllinger

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "update: August 2003 Gumpenstein M. GREIMEL, A. Pöllinger"— Presentation transcript:

1 CAP Reform Impact to the development of animal number (environment) in Austria
update: August 2003 Gumpenstein M. GREIMEL, A. Pöllinger Layout: Birgit Huber-Kitzer

2 Content Main effects of decoupling Cross compliance
Some details concerning coupling effects Funding / Support (Degression) Policy position - Austria Projections Summary

3 Decoupling - Effects in Austria
Used for dairy cows/production NOT for suckling cows (start: 31/7/2007) Reduced milk price (15-20%) leads to higher milk production per cow and a shift of the main milk production from disadvantaged to advantaged areas Extensification in mountain areas For mountain areas: suckling cows, young stock, sheep and goats

4 Cross Compliance Keeping the soils in good agricultural condition
Maintain the grassland area (reference day: , nat. decision) Minimum requirements (18 EU-regulatives), fixing of indikators for controll reasons Most standards are already included in the Austrian national law system

5 Increase of 50.000 premiums for suckler cows/heifers
Cattle Increase of premiums for suckler cows/heifers

6 Sheep and goats Premiums: 50 % decoupled
Leads to a slightly increasing number of sheep and goats

7 Policy positions in Austria
Farm based direct payments Crop production: 100 % decoupling Suckling cows: 100% coupling Slaughter premiums: 60 % decoupling Mother sheep, -goats: 50 % decoupling Milk premiums: 100 % decoupling start:

8 Dairy cattle - Projection
Categories 2000 / (2002) 2010 2020 Dairy cows Suckler cows IIASA 6211) / (5891)) 2531) (2451)) 621 4812) 3134) 586 3993) 574 References/data basis 1) ÖSTAT Austrian Statistic Center 4350 (4600) kg milk per cow and year 2)Milk quota: 2,791 Mio t / average milk production per cow estimated:5800 kg/cow/a 4) Steinwidder, 2003 3)7000 kg/cow/a From 2015 on there might be no quota system in the EU! 4) Steinwidder, 2003 – static projection (animal number in 1000)

9 Dairy cattle projection Comparison between IIASA and national projection

10 Other Cattle – Projection
Categories 2000 / (2002) 2010 2020 Other cattle (Including suckler cows) Method 2 IIASA 1.5341)1.5051)) 1.510 1.4882) ) 1.530 1.3792) ) 1.364 References/data basis 1) ÖSTAT 2) Calculation: Total cattle – less cows and less calves (other cattle are kept on the same level) 3) Method 2: Reduction of other cattle by 2% per year (animal number in 1000)

11 Dairy and Other Cattle Projection Comparison between IIASA and national projection
IIASA projection National expert projection/CAP Reform

12 Further Projections - Generell
Swine: realistic szenario used by IIASA (slightly increasing) because of a switch from fatting bulls to fattening pigs – no direct CAP influence Poultry – no direct CAP influence Suckler cows – coupling between financial support and production Sheep and goats – more or less the same number, a slightly increasing effect – land- scape function and small financial support

13 Summary Reduced number of cattle (other cattle and dairy cows)
Less grazing systems for dairy cows New cow houses are loose housing systems (tied stall systems are forbidden from 2010) Only marginally affects for swine, sheep, goats, horses and poultry National financial support for biogas production

14 Thanks for your attention


Download ppt "update: August 2003 Gumpenstein M. GREIMEL, A. Pöllinger"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google