Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

This slide deck is part of a presentation given by Saul Greenberg at a UIST 2007 panel on Evaluating user interface systems research (see paper by Dan.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "This slide deck is part of a presentation given by Saul Greenberg at a UIST 2007 panel on Evaluating user interface systems research (see paper by Dan."— Presentation transcript:

1 This slide deck is part of a presentation given by Saul Greenberg at a UIST 2007 panel on Evaluating user interface systems research (see paper by Dan Olson in ACM DL) Its content was based on a paper written by Saul Greenberg and Bill Buxton, available at:

2 I need to do an evaluation

3 What’s the problem?

4 It won’t get accepted if I don’t. Duh!

5 Dogma Course Introduction

6 Good HCI Course Introduction

7 Time Learning Brian Gaines Breakthrough Replication Empiricism Theory
major creative advances Replication ideas mimicked and altered; increasing experience Empiricism lessons formulated as empirical design rules Theory underlying causal systems Automation accepted Maturity used routinely Brian Gaines

8 Evaluation sweet spot Interface validation and refinement*
Breakthrough Replication Empiricism Theory Automation Maturity Interface validation and refinement* *70% quantitative, 30% qualitative

9 Concepts, Sketches Breakthrough Replication Empiricism Theory
Automation Maturity Concepts, Sketches

10 Memex Bush Concept

11 Unimplemented and untested design. Microfilm is impractical
Unimplemented and untested design. Microfilm is impractical. The work is premature. Resubmit after you build and evaluate this design.

12 Sketchpad Sutherland Working idea

13 Complex controls, overly simplistic drawings Recommend you evaluate a trained draftsman using Sketchpad vs. paper and pencil with real drafting tasks

14 Augment Engelbart Deployed idea

15 While ‘tested’ by your team, this is not an objective validation.

16 What to do?

17 Reflection Bill Buxton, Sketching the User Experience

18 Cultural Appropriation
Breakthrough Replication Empiricism Theory Automation Maturity Cultural Appropriation

19 Hypertext

20

21

22

23

24 What to do?

25 Case / field studies Cultural probes Reflection Extreme uses…

26 Evaluation Course Introduction

27 More Appropriate Evaluation
Course Introduction

28 We decide what is good research

29 Cultural appropriation
Time Learning Breakthrough Breakthrough Replication Replication Empiricism Empiricism Theory Theory Automation Automation Maturity Maturity But is this lack of tools really a bottleneck? Well, in the 1980s, Computer Scientist Brian Gaines introduced a model of how science technology develops over time, and how people learn from this development It unfolds from <READ> Breakthrough -> Invention Replication -> Research Empiricism -> Product Innovation Theory -> Product Lines Automation -> Low cost products Maturity -> Throw away products Sketches Interface validation Cultural appropriation Brian Gaines

30 grouplab.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~papers/


Download ppt "This slide deck is part of a presentation given by Saul Greenberg at a UIST 2007 panel on Evaluating user interface systems research (see paper by Dan."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google