2. Chapter 5 Policing: Legal Aspects

3. The right against unreasonable searches and seizures are guaranteed under which Constitutional Amendment?
Fourth Amendment
Fifth Amendment
Sixth Amendment
Eighth Amendment
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

4. Correct answer 1. Fourth Amendment
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

5. What should be done with the exclusionary rule?
Abolish the exclusionary rule
Create more exceptions
Do not allow any exceptions to the exclusionary rule
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

6. Survey or opinion question Graph answers for class discussion
Correct Answer
Survey or opinion question
Graph answers for class discussion
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

7. What U. S. Supreme Court decision forms the basis of the exclusionary rule?
Miranda v. Arizona
Gideon v. Wainwright
U. S. v. Leon
Weeks v. U. S.
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

8. Correct answer 4. Weeks v. U. S.
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

9. This case made the exclusionary rule applicable to criminal prosecutions at the state level.
Weeks v. U. S.
Miranda v. Arizona
Mapp v. Ohio
Terry v. Ohio
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

10. Correct answer Mapp v. Ohio
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

11. This case limited the police officer’s right to search incident to an arrest to the area under the immediate control of the person arrested.
Mapp v. Ohio
Chimel v. California
U. S. v. Leon
Arizona v. Hicks
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

12. Correct answer Chimel v. California
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

13. Coolidge v. New Hampshire
In this case the U. S. Supreme Court ruled that police officers may not enter a home to conduct a warrantless search if one resident gives permission but the other says no.
Georgia v. Randolph
Terry v. Ohio
Illinois v. Rodriquez
Coolidge v. New Hampshire
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

14. Correct answer Georgia v. Randolph
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

15. This case is known as the good-faith exception.
Minnesota v. Carter
Georgia v. Randolph
Nix v. Williams
U. S. v. Leon
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

16. Correct answer U. S. v. Leon
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

17. In this case, the U. S. Supreme Court created a “computer errors exception” to the exclusionary rule.
Harris v. U. S.
Arizona v. Hicks
Arizona v. Evans
Miranda v. Arizona
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

18. Correct answer Arizona v. Evans
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

19. Stansbury v. California Brown v. Texas
This case extended the authority of the police to search locations in a house where a potentially dangerous person could hide while an arrest warrant is being served.
Maryland v. Buie
Horton v. California
Stansbury v. California
Brown v. Texas
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

20. Correct answer Carroll v. U. S.
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

21. Probable cause warrant Suspicionless search
This is a search warrant issued on the basis of probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime, while not currently at the place described, will likely be there when the warrant is executed.
Good faith warrant
Anticipatory warrant
Probable cause warrant
Suspicionless search
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

22. Correct answer Anticipatory warrant
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

23. This was the first significant case involving an automobile search.
California v. Carney
Illinois v. Caballes
Chambers v. Florida
Carroll v. U. S.
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

24. Correct answer Maryland v. Buie
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

25. Do you agree in this day and age we need high technology searches and suspicionless searches on public streets and transportation?
No it is invasive
Yes, I would feel safer
Undecided
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

26. Survey or opinion question Graph answers for class discussion
Correct answer
Survey or opinion question
Graph answers for class discussion
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

27. This case formally recognized the right to have legal counsel present during police interrogation.
Leyra v. Denno
Arizona v. Fulminante
Escobedo v. Illinois
Chapman v. California
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

28. Correct answer Escobedo v. Illinois
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

29. This case is known as the public-safety exception.
Nix v. Williams
U. S. v. Leon
Terry v. Ohio
New York v. Quarles
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

30. Correct answer New York v. Quarles
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

31. Miranda warnings must be given if the offender is being interrogated but is not under arrest.
True
False
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger

32. Correct answer False Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 9/e
Frank Schmalleger