1. Bus 411
DAY 19

2. Agenda Case Feedback Team work 1 B, 1 C and 1 D
Weakest part is Financials
Ratios - Trends and comparisons
Cost - EPS/EBIT<> cost of implementations
2006 data is available for most companies
Second weakest part is Strategic Formulations
Matrix analysis  Strategic choice
Third is situational analysis
Problems with external analysis and trends
Missing economic and demographic treading
Demand and supply analysis
Use the book
Page
I do not require everything that is in these steps but if you did everrything in these pages I would be really impressed
Case study four Hershey foods
Team work
Send me your presentation at least 30 min prior to class
All presentation will be uploaded to class slides directory for further use and evaluation .

3. Format Identify Mission, Vision, Objectives, Strategies
Develop New Vision and Mission
Most are poor
Identify external opportunities and threats
CPM
EFE
Identify internal strengths and weaknesses
IFE
Financial ratios
Analyze
SWOT Matrix
SPACE
BCG
IE matrix
Grand Strategy Matrix
QSPM
Give advantage and disadvantages of alternative strategies
Recommend
Strategies and long range objectives
Show cost
Specify how strategies are to be implemented and what results to expect
Recommend specific annual objectives (goal) and polices
Recommend procedures for evaluation
Be Original – Take chances
But make sure it is realistic
Remember business rewards risk taking
Be ready for Cross-examination

4. teams Team 1 Team 2 Team 3 J. Harbison N. Lozier M. Martin C. Brusig
C. Pennine
T. Nhundu
J. Jalbert
Team 3
K. Beaulieu
M. Doucette
D. Lemon

5. Timeline April 10 April 13 (Friday the 13th) April 24 April 27
First round scores received & discussed
Team 1 Case Study Five Hershey Foods Corporation
Case study team work
April 13 (Friday the 13th)
Team 2 Case Study Six Kellogg Company
April 17
Team 3 Case Study Seven Freddo (Ice Cream Co.)
April 20
Second round Scores received
Student choose Last Case
Team 1 Case Study 19 JetBlue Airlines
April 24
Team 2 Case Study 20 AirTran Airways
Case study team work
April 27
Team 3 Case Study 21 USA Truck
Last 3 cases are student choice
May1 and 4
Take home portion of Final exam assigned
May 8
In Class Final exam
Take home portion of final exam due
Bring Calculators

6. Case Presentation Analysis
Company: Date:
Presenting Team Members:
Place comments after each rating.
Ratings (circle the appropriate numbers).
CONTENT
Poor
Below
Average
Above
Superior
1. Mission and Vision Statement 1 2 3 4 5
2. Thoroughness, accuracy, and depth of external analysis
3. Thoroughness, accuracy, and depth of internal analysis
4. Identification and evaluation of alternative strategies using matrices
5. Quality, quantity, feasibility, and relevance of recommendations
6. Justification and support for recommendations
DELIVERY
1. Organization of presentation
2. Professionalism of presentation
3. Use of visuals and color
4. Communication skills of team
5. Use of time (40 min presentation)
6. Handling of questions (up to 10 minutes)
OVERALL EVALUATION:
Numeric Score = 40 + (Avg * 12)

7. Peer Review for Case studies
In rating yourself and your team members, use a one- to five-point scale, where 5 = superior, 4 = above average, 3 = average, 2 = below average, and 1 = really weak. Add the scores to obtain a total score for yourself and the other group members. Put any comments you like on the bottom or back of this page. Fold this sheet when you complete the ratings below. If you receive a poor rating on this evaluation, your final case average will be lowered one letter grade. A superior rating may add points to the final case average.
Put your name and your team members’ names in the spaces provided, one name at the top of each column.
Names:
Ratings:
On time for all group meetings:
Helped keep the group cohesive:
Number of useful ideas contributed:
Quantity of work done:
Quality of work done: +
Add Total Scores Here: