Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Prabhas Chongstitvatana

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Prabhas Chongstitvatana"— Presentation transcript:

1 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
NP-complete proofs The circuit satisfiability proof of NP-completeness relies on a direct proof that L p CIRCUIT-SAT for every L  NP. Lemma 36.8 If L is a language such that L’ p L for some L’  NPC, then L is NP-hard. Moreover, if L  NP, then L  NPC. Prabhas Chongstitvatana

2 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
Prove L  NP Select a known NP-complete language L’ Descrive an algorithm that compute f mapping every instance of L’ to an instance of L. Prove f satisfies x  L’ iff f(x)  L x  {0,1}* Prove that the algorithm computing f runs in polynomial time. Prabhas Chongstitvatana

3 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
NP-complete problems SAT = { <Phi> | Phi is a satisfiable boolean formula } Theorem 36.9 SAT  NP-complete Proof : SAT  NP (show a certificate can be verified in polynomial time), CIRCUIT-SAT p SAT Prabhas Chongstitvatana

4 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
3-CNF-SAT CNF conjunctive normal form (AND of Ored-clauses) to simplify reduction algorithm 3-CNF-SAT  NP, SAT  p 3-CNF-SAT CLIQUE = { <G,K> | G is a graph with a clique of size k } A clique in an undirected graph G = (V,E) is a subset V’  V of vertices each pair of which is connected by an edge in E (a clique is a complete subgraph of G). Prabhas Chongstitvatana

5 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
u w x v y z CLIQUE  NP; 3-CNF-SAT p CLIQUE Prabhas Chongstitvatana

6 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
VERTEX-COVER = { <G,k> | graph G has vertex cover of size k } A vertex cover of an undirected graph G = (V,E) is a subset V’ V such that if (u,v) E, then u  V’ or v  V’ (or both). VERTEX-COVER  NP; CLIQUE p VERTEX-COVER Prabhas Chongstitvatana

7 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
SUBSET-SUM = { <S, t> | there exists a subset S’  S such that t = Example : if S = {1, 4, 16, 64, 256, 1040, 1041, 1093, 1284, 1344} and t = The subset S’ = {1, 6, 64, 256, 1040, 1093, 1284 } is a solution. SUBSET-SUM  NP; VERTEX-COVER p SUBSET-SUM Prabhas Chongstitvatana

8 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
HAM-CYCLE = {<G> | G is a hamitonian graph } HAM-CYLE  NP; 3-CNF-SAT p HAM-CYCLE TSP = {<G,c,k> | G = (V,E) is a complete graph, c is a function from V  V  Z, k  Z, and G has a traveling-saleman tour with cost at most k } An integer cost c(i,j) to travel from city i to city j. A tour is a hamiltonian cycle. TSP  NP; HAM-CYCLE p TSP Prabhas Chongstitvatana

9 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
CIRCUIT-SAT 3-CNF-SAT SAT TSP HAM-CYCLE CLIQUE VERTEX-COVER SUBSET-SUM Prabhas Chongstitvatana

10 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
Unsolvable A set with as many elements as the integers is called countably infinite. Not every infinite set is countable. Let’s show that there are computationally unsolvable problems. The subset of problems can be described by boolean functions on the integers; f such that f(n) is 0/1. Prabhas Chongstitvatana

11 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
Suppose the set of all such functions is countably infinite. There is a correspondence between each function and each integer. . . . f i n f i ( n ) By diagonalization, we can show that at least one boolean function cannot be in this list. Prabhas Chongstitvatana

12 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
If every program is a finite string of symbols, each chosen from a single finite alphabet, then it is possible to show that the set of all programs is countably infinite. So there is more problems than there are programs to solve them. Thus, at least one function is not describable as the output of any program, so it is computationally unsolvable. Prabhas Chongstitvatana

13 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
Example : A simple system such as Presburger arithmetic, is a formal system of the positive integers together with addition and equality alone. Deciding whether a statement in this system is true is in the length of the statement. Prabhas Chongstitvatana

14 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
Unsolvable relativized unsolvable (oracle machines) Solvable provably infeasible (Presburger arithmetic) probably infeasible (satisfiability) feasible hard (normal optimization problems) easy (normal computer science problems) randomized easy (primality testing) really easy (sorting) Prabhas Chongstitvatana

15 Prabhas Chongstitvatana
Solving hard problems Relax the problem -- use approx. algo. Relax the method -- use probabilistic algo and give up total correctness Relax the architecture -- use parallel Relax the machine -- use analog computer ? Prabhas Chongstitvatana


Download ppt "Prabhas Chongstitvatana"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google