1. Early rehabilitation effect for traumatic spinal cord injury
Mikio Sumida, MD, Mikio Fujimoto, MD, Akihiro Tokuhiro, MD, Toshikatsu Tominaga, MD, Akira Magara, MD, Ryusei Uchida, MD 
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
DOI: /apmr
Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
Injury-admission interval and MRR. MRR of subjects ranged from −.16 to 1 if admission was within 2 weeks postinjury, from 0 to.59 if within 6 months, and from 0 to 0.1 if admission was delayed more than 6 months.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr )
Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Regression lines for FIM score and ASIA motor score at discharge of the early (n = 19) and delayed (n = 17) central cord subgroups, showing higher FIM score for ASIA motor score.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr )
Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Regression lines for FIM score and ASIA motor score at discharge of the early (n = 17) and delayed (n = 25) paraplegia subgroups, showing higher FIM score for ASIA motor score.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr )
Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 4
Regression lines for FIM score and ASIA motor score at discharge of the early (n = 24) and delayed (n = 29) tetraplegia subgroups. The regression lines crossed.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr )
Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

6. Fig. 5
Regression lines for physical FIM score and ASIA motor score at discharge of the early (n = 19) and delayed (n = 17) central cord subgroups, showing higher FIM score for ASIA motor score.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr )
Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

7. Fig. 6
Regression lines for physical FIM score and ASIA motor score at discharge of the early (n = 17) and delayed (n = 25) paraplegia subgroups, showing higher FIM score for ASIA motor score.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr )
Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

8. Fig. 7
Regression lines for physical FIM score and ASIA motor score at discharge of the early (n = 24) and delayed (n = 29) tetraplegia subgroups, showing higher FIM score for ASIA motor score.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr )
Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions