1. <Aug 2010>
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: [Resolution for comments on section , Differential PSK with spreading]
Date Submitted: [August 2010]
Source: [Kiran Bynam] Company [Samsung Electronics]
Address [Bagmane Tech Park, Block-B, Bangalore, India]
Voice:[ ], FAX: [ ],
Re: [Proposed Resolution of D0 Comment S10-430]
Abstract: [Comment resolution]
Purpose: [To change the text and euqations as per the IEEE normative text policies]
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P
<author>, <company>

2. Proposed Resolution of D0 Comment S10-430
<month year>
Proposed Resolution of D0 Comment S10-430
Kiran Bynam
<author>, <company>

3. doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#>
<month year>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year>
D0 Comment S10-430
Comment: Link to PSDU timing parameters is not clear
Sub-clause , page 182, Line 3
Resolution Proposed: Give a write up in PSDU timing parameters saying that 6,7 (R0,R1, R2) data rates use the section
<author>, <company>
<author>, <company>

4. Proposed Resolution(s)
<month year>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year>
Proposed Resolution(s)
Please add the following line in section 10.10, page 173, Line 12
The Modulation for the data rates represented by 3 bits (R0, R1, R2) as 0 to 5 shall be as defined in The Modulation for the data rates represented by 3 bits (R0, R1, R2) as 6 to 7 shall be as defined in
<author>, <company>
<author>, <company>

5. Comment: Understanding of the scheme not clear
<month year>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year>
D0 Comment S10-426
Comment: Understanding of the scheme not clear
Sub-clause , page 182, Line 3
Resolution Proposed: Can be explained with diagram
Slide 5
<author>, <company>
Page 5
<author>, <company>

6. Please add this figure in 10.11.4.3
<month year>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year>
Proposed Resolutions
Please add this figure in
Spreaded
DBPSK/
DQPSK
Pulse
Shaping RF
Front end
SHR+PHR+PSDU
Slide 6
<author>, <company>
Page 6
<author>, <company>

7. D0 Comment S10-555 Comment: Modify eq. accordingly.
<month year>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year>
D0 Comment S10-555
Comment: Modify eq. accordingly.
Sub-clause , page 181, Line 17
Resolution proposed
1. h should be written in a way consistent with h^{(m)}.
2. k should be omitted, since there is no mention, yet alone definition, of other BANs hopping sequences. The standard is dealing with only one BAN.
3. T_w should multiply h^{(m)} in order for (90) to be correct.
Slide 7
<author>, <company>
Page 7
<author>, <company>

8. Proposed Resolutions Replace the equation 90 with following
<month year>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year>
Proposed Resolutions
Replace the equation 90 with following
and sentence “ is time hopping sequence of kth BAN” as is time hopping sequence” at
Slide 8
<author>, <company>
Page 8
<author>, <company>

9. Comment: specify barker sequence
<month year>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year>
D0 Comment s10-633, S10-634
Comment: specify barker sequence
Sub-clause , page 182, Line 2
Slide 9
<author>, <company>
Page 9
<author>, <company>

10. <month year>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year>
Proposed Resolutions
Replace the text “b(i) is Barker code of length NB” with
Barker sequence “b(i) is [ ] of length 7 (NB) “
Slide 10
<author>, <company>
Page 10
<author>, <company>

11. S10-196, s10-314, s10-398
Comment: "Seq_m" is not the best notation. Also Barker sequence should be explicitly specified in equation 90, 91, 92 in page 181, 182

12. Resolution Seqm(i) to be replaced by sm(i)
Replace Seq-1(i) =1 , for all I
with
s-1 =[ ]