1. RANDOM CASE ALLOCATION JUDGE BADRI NIPARISHVILI
ZADAR, 14-15/09/18
Step Forward
JUDGE BADRI NIPARISHVILI
GEORGIA

2. IMPORTANCE AND ADOPTION
IMPARTIAL AND INDEPENDENT COURT
EFFICIENT ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
EQUAL WORK FLOW
IMPORTANCE AND ADOPTION
PREVIOUS SYSTEM
2014 – INITIATIVE
2017 – ADOPTION OF LAW/RULES
2017 – MANAGEMENT DEPARTEMENT
2017 – TRIAL
2018 – START FUNCTIONING

3. REGULATIONS . . . RANDOM ALLOCATION SPECIALIZATION: EXEPTIONS
NO COURT PANELS/NARROW SPECIALIZATION
SMALL COURTS
COURT PANELS
NARROW SPECIALIZATION
JUDGE ON DUTY
EXEPTIONS

4. COLLEGIAL HEARING OF CASES
COURT OF CASSATION
GRAND CHAMBER
COURT OF APPEAL
CITY COURT
JUDGE REPORTER
ALL MEMBERS
2 MAMBER OF THE BOARD – PRE-DETERMINED ORDER

5. EQUAL DISTRIBUTION QUANTITY NOT CONTENT DIFFERENCE BY 3 CASES
THE SYSTEM LOGIC ALL THESE PARAMETERS:
AVERAGE NUMBER OF DISTRIBUTED CASES
NUMBER OF CASES DISTRIBUTED ON EACH JUDGE
NUMBER GENERATED BY THE RANDOM SELECTION
EXCEPTIONS:
CHAIRPERSONS & DEPUTY CHAIRPERSONS
JUDGE MEMBERS OF THE HIGH COUNCIL & SECRETARY
HEALTH/FAMILLY PROBLEMS OR VERY IMPORTANT OBJECTIVE REASON

6. SUSPENDING ALLOCATION
SUSPENDING WORKING RELATIONS
EXCEPTION:
DECISION-MAKING TIME 72 HOURS – ABSENCE MAX. 5 DAYS
LONG-TERM ABSENCE / DISSMISSION / RELOCATION
REMAINING CASES – AMONG OTHER JUDGES

7. IMPEDIMENT OF THE E-SYSTEM
ALLOCATION IN ALPHABETIC ORDER
SPECIALIST OF THE REGISTRY
MAIN CASES – IMPEDIMENT MORE THAN 2 DAYS
URGENT CASES – IMPEDIMENT MORE THAN 3 HOURS
OTHER DROWBACK NOT PROVIDED BY THE RULES
DOCUMENTARY STATING
IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE HIGH COUNCIL
SEND THE LIST OF CASES TO THE HIGH COUNCIL
! CASES SHALL BE REGISTRATED IN THE E-SYSTEM

8. TRIAL OF THE E-SYSTEM 1 CITY COURT 6 MONTHS PERIOD 2600 CASES
4 IMPEDIMENTS:
1 LASTED MORE THAN 2 DAYS
17 CASES WERE ALLOCATED IN ALPHABETIC ORDER

9. WORKING PROCESS ALL COURTS 31/12/2017 -18/01/2018
EXCEPTION: ONLY 1 JUDGE IN MAGISTRATE COURT
31/12/ /01/2018
16000 OUT OF CASES
2 IMPEDIMENTS
LASTED NO MORE THAN 2 DAYS
33 CASES WERE ALLOCATED IN ALPHABETIC ORDER

10. ANY QUESTIONS?