1. RECAP Odd one out Match them up 1. Hare 3. Hick 5. Flew 2. Swinburne
4. Ward
6. Mitchell
Match them up
a. blik
d. Parable of the freedom fighter
b. Eschatological Verification
e. All experiences are ‘verifiable in principle’
c. Toy cupboard analogy
f. Falsification principle

2. The answers Scholar Idea Flew Falsification Hick
Eschatological Verification
Hare
Blik
Swinburne
Toy cupboard analogy
Ward
All statements are verifiable in principle

3. 4 C Religious language as non-cognitive and analogical
Proportion and attribution (St Thomas Aquinas) and qualifier and disclosure (Ian Ramsey).
Challenges including how far analogies can give meaningful insights into religious language. A consideration of how these two views (Aquinas/Ramsey) can be used to help understand religious teachings.

4. Which pictures can be grouped together?
What is the key term that links each group?
Are the words being used in the same way?

5. Different ways we use language
Univocal – same word, same meaning e.g. mammal Equivocal – same word, different meaning e.g. tick Analogy – comparison between two things

6. Aquinas rejected univocal language to speak about God
Saying ‘God is wise’ is not the same as saying that ‘David Attenborough is wise’.
God is the cause of wisdom and is perfectly wise.
In comparison to God, a human is not as wise (or perfectly wise).
Aquinas states that words which indicate perfection (like “wise”) are not used of God and creatures univocally.
It would limit God, anthromorphises God
Task 2 page 4

7. Aquinas rejected equivocal language to speak about God
We would know nothing about God.
Aquinas quotes the Bible, where the Apostle Paul states:
“The invisible things of God are made known by the things that are made.”

8. Analogy consolidation task
Extension – think of three other problems with using univocal and equivocal language to speak of God.

9. Aquinas was attempting to steer between two ideas about how language is used of God.
Words have the exact same meaning when applied to God
(univocal)
Words have a completely different meaning when applied to God (equivocal)

10. A middle way
Analogy is a middle way between univocal language (kataphatic way) and equivocal language (apophatic way). We can speak of God but the words don’t mean exactly the same thing (they are not univocal). They also don’t mean an entirely different thing (they aren’t equivocal). Rather, the language is analogical. It allows us to speak of God without limiting him.

11. St Thomas Aquinas
Aquinas argued that there is a relationship between the world and God because
he created and sustains it therefore there is a point of comparison – causal link

12. Analogy: the middle way
It is through analogy that words are used of both God and creatures.
Aquinas developed two ideas of analogy when talking about God:
Analogy of attribution
Analogy of proportion

13. Analogy of attribution
One word is used of two things because of how they relate to each other.
Humans have good qualities as they were caused by God and God ‘attributed’ goodness to us
Another example
We can say that the bread is good, so the baker is good as the baker caused the bread. The bread derives its goodness from the baker.
1. Aquinas’ example Animal is healthy. Animals urine is healthy, it is caused by the health of the animal
Healthy

14. “We are unable to speak of God except in the language we use of creatures.”
Therefore there is a relationship between the words we use of both God and creatures.
For example, God is the cause and source of wisdom therefore it is meaningful to say God is wise.
God is the cause of wisdom
God
Wise

15. Analogy of proportion - scale
Definition - where a word is employed to refer to a quality that something possesses in proportion to the kind of reality it possesses.
e.g. The example of ‘life’ -
A carrot has life, I have life, God has life.
We cannot fully understand God’s wisdom, as He is beyond human understanding.
We can ascribe a quality to one thing because it points towards another thing which has that quality
We can come to some understanding of what it means that God is wise because we have a human idea of “wise”.
It is a proportional wisdom – on a different scale to
God’s wisdom

16. Hick’s explanation – task 3 page 5
Analogy upwards to God, the source
Analogy downwards to animals

17. What analogical words do:
Analogical language leaves room for the sense of mystery of the divine being, without falling into the traps of extreme equivocalism in which we cannot speak meaningfully of God at all.
Complete task 4 on page 7
Extension – add other examples e.g. bread
Complete the four revision questions on page 6

18. Consolidation task
Read the the John Hick extract pages Summary of analogy How to write an essay on analogy - Eduqas