Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Ch 4: Perceiving Persons

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Ch 4: Perceiving Persons"— Presentation transcript:

1 Ch 4: Perceiving Persons
Part 1: Feb. 9, 2012

2 Social Perception Get info from people, situations, & behavior
We make quick 1st impressions of people Attempt to read traits from faces Baby-faced vs. mature features Is there an evolutionary need? Situations – Scripts

3 Situations & Behavior Behavior & social perception:
Use situational cues to interpret behavior Behavior & social perception: Derive meaning from physical behavior Includes nonverbal behavior 6 primary universal emotions – what are they? Facial expressions across cultures – results? Matsumoto’s research – results?

4 Face Recognition & Emotion
Evoluationary value to quick recognition Angry faces? Attentional blink = how does it work? What are exceptions?

5 Nonverbal Behavior Importance of eye contact & touch
Interpretation of avoiding eye contact? Differences in nonverbal cues across cultures Examples?

6 Detecting Deception Can we use this info to detect deception?
Facial versus body movements What leads to better accuracy? Not much better than 50/50 chance see Table 4.2 in book

7 Microexpression Research
Paul Ekman’s research: What are microexpressions? Examples of contempt, disgust… Apply to security screening situations - how do these work? High cognitive effort tasks

8 Attributions Attribution = explanation about a behavior
Heider – personal vs. situational Attribution theories: 1. Jones – Correspondent Inference theory: Infer from action - what give the most info about the person? Did the person have a choice? Was the behavior expected? How many positive effects were there?

9 Attribution theories (cont.)
2) Kelly’s Covariation theory: Attribute behavior to internal (person) or external (situation) based on 3 questions – 1. Consensus 2. Distinctiveness 3. Consistency See fig 4.4

10 If low distinctiveness & low consensus, but high consistency, which attribution?
Example? If high distinctiveness & high consensus, but low consistency, which attribution?


Download ppt "Ch 4: Perceiving Persons"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google