1. Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages 750-759 (May 2017)
Application of a Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping System to Assess Distant Prostate Cancer Outcomes 
Michael S. Leapman, Janet E. Cowan, Jeffry Simko, Gray Roberge, Bradley A. Stohr, Peter R. Carroll, Matthew R. Cooperberg 
European Urology 
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
DOI: /j.eururo
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
Kaplan-Meier survival plots and tables with numbers of events and numbers of patients still at risk at each time point for (A) prostate cancer–specific survival and (B) bone metastasis–free survival stratified by prognostic Gleason score category at biopsy. CE=cumulative events.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier survival plots and tables with numbers of events and numbers of patients still at risk at each time point for (A) prostate cancer–specific survival and (B) bone metastasis–free survival stratified by traditional extended Gleason categories. CE=cumulative events.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions