1. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 1 PAC Review CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING A. Enomoto, V. Kuchler, J. Osborne

2. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 2 Outline CFS Introduction CFS Introduction Geotechnical Conditions and Construction Methods Geotechnical Conditions and Construction Methods Description of CFS Cost Drivers Description of CFS Cost Drivers Americas and European Design Americas and European Design CFS Schedule CFS Schedule Summary Summary Asian Design – A Enomoto Asian Design – A Enomoto

3. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 3 CFS Introduction and Regional Overview Overall Siting Approach was to Initially Identify a Sample Site in Each of the Three Global Regions Overall Siting Approach was to Initially Identify a Sample Site in Each of the Three Global Regions Americas and European Sites Still Considered Sample Sites Americas and European Sites Still Considered Sample Sites Asian Region has Identified Two Candidate Sites Asian Region has Identified Two Candidate Sites All Regions Used the Same Beamline Lattice Design All Regions Used the Same Beamline Lattice Design Underground Enclosures were Tailored to Meet Local Site Geologic and Topographical Conditions Underground Enclosures were Tailored to Meet Local Site Geologic and Topographical Conditions Local Conditions Also Affected the Type of HLRF System Used Local Conditions Also Affected the Type of HLRF System Used Americas and Europe Used the Klystron Cluster System (KCS) Americas and Europe Used the Klystron Cluster System (KCS) Asia Used the Distributed Klystron System (DKS) Asia Used the Distributed Klystron System (DKS)

4. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 4 Regional Geotechnical Conditions and Underground Construction Methods (1) Americas Region Americas Region Sample Site Centered on Fermilab Sample Site Centered on Fermilab Uniform Surface Elevation Supports Surface Buildings Uniform Surface Elevation Supports Surface Buildings Uniform Galena-Plattville Dolomite Limestone Strata Uniform Galena-Plattville Dolomite Limestone Strata Tunnel Depth ~130 m Tunnel Depth ~130 m Main Underground Access by Vertical Shaft Main Underground Access by Vertical Shaft TBM Excavation Method Used for Main Tunnel Drives TBM Excavation Method Used for Main Tunnel Drives Drill and Blast Excavation Method Used for Shafts, Widened Enclosures and Caverns Drill and Blast Excavation Method Used for Shafts, Widened Enclosures and Caverns Widened Enclosures and Caverns do not Require Arched Ceilings Widened Enclosures and Caverns do not Require Arched Ceilings Klystron Cluster System (KCS) HLRF Klystron Cluster System (KCS) HLRF Most RF Equipment is Located in Surface Buildings at Shaft Access Most RF Equipment is Located in Surface Buildings at Shaft Access Electrical Equipment, Cooling Towers and Cryo Plants Located on the Surface at Shaft Access Electrical Equipment, Cooling Towers and Cryo Plants Located on the Surface at Shaft Access

5. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 5 Regional Geotechnical Conditions and Underground Construction Methods (2) European Region European Region Sample Site Adjacent to Existing CERN Laboratory Sample Site Adjacent to Existing CERN Laboratory Relatively Uniform Surface Elevation Supports Surface Buildings Relatively Uniform Surface Elevation Supports Surface Buildings Uniform Molasse Rock Strata Uniform Molasse Rock Strata Tunnel Depth 100 - 150 m Tunnel Depth 100 - 150 m Main Underground Access by Vertical Shaft Main Underground Access by Vertical Shaft TBM Excavation Method Used for Main Tunnel Drives TBM Excavation Method Used for Main Tunnel Drives Roadheaders or Rock-Breakers Used for Widened Enclosures and Caverns Roadheaders or Rock-Breakers Used for Widened Enclosures and Caverns Traditional Excavation Equipment and Special Ground Support Measures Used for Shaft Construction Traditional Excavation Equipment and Special Ground Support Measures Used for Shaft Construction Widened Enclosures and Caverns will Require Arched Ceilings Widened Enclosures and Caverns will Require Arched Ceilings Klystron Cluster System (KCS) HLRF Klystron Cluster System (KCS) HLRF Most RF Equipment is Located in Surface Buildings at Shaft Access Most RF Equipment is Located in Surface Buildings at Shaft Access Electrical Equipment, Cooling Towers and Cryo Plants Located on the Surface at Shaft Access Electrical Equipment, Cooling Towers and Cryo Plants Located on the Surface at Shaft Access

6. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 6 CFS Regional Design Composition

7. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 7 Main CFS Cost Drivers

8. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 8 1.7.1 Civil Engineering – Americas and European Regions (1)

9. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 9 1.7.1 Civil Engineering – Americas and European Regions (2) Americas Region Sample Site at FNAL European Region Sample Site at CERN European Region Sample Site at Dubna

10. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 10 1.7.1 Civil Engineering – Americas and European Regions (3) Regional Differences Between the Main Linac Tunnel Cross Sections – Americas Region Regional Differences Between the Main Linac Tunnel Cross Sections – Americas Region Tunnel Diameter Tunnel Diameter Americas Cross Section is Smaller (5.0m vs. 5.2m) Americas Cross Section is Smaller (5.0m vs. 5.2m) Ventilation Systems Ventilation Systems Longitudinal System for the Longitudinal System for the Americas Tunnel Air Supply Ducts in Floor Slab Air Supply Ducts in Floor Slab Tunnel Used as Return Duct Tunnel Used as Return Duct Services & Cables in the Concrete Services & Cables in the ConcreteInvert Electronic Racks and Shielding Electronic Racks and Shielding Space for Waveguides Space for Waveguides

11. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 11 1.7.1 Civil Engineering – Americas and European Regions (4) Regional Differences Between the Main Linac Tunnel Cross Sections Regional Differences Between the Main Linac Tunnel Cross Sections Tunnel Diameter Tunnel Diameter European Cross Section is Larger (5.2m and 8.0m vs. 5.0m) European Cross Section is Larger (5.2m and 8.0m vs. 5.0m) Ventilation Systems Ventilation Systems Transversal Ventilation System with Transversal Ventilation System with Longitudinal Ducts at Tunnel Crown Services & Cables in the Concrete Services & Cables in the ConcreteInvert Avoided in European Region Avoided in European Region Electronic Racks and Shielding Electronic Racks and Shielding Space for Waveguides Space for Waveguides Less Space for European Less Space for European Layout, but, as needed, Space can be made Available

12. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 12 1.7.1 Civil Engineering – Americas and European Regions (5) Americas Region Tunnel Cross Section (Looking Downstream e- Linac) European Region Tunnel Cross Section (Looking Upstream e- Linac)

13. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 13 1.7.1 Civil Engineering – Americas and European Regions (6) Americas Region Interaction Region European Region Interaction Region

14. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 14 1.7.1 Civil Engineering – Americas and European Regions (7) Damping Ring Cross Section

15. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 15 1.7.1 Civil Engineering – Americas and European Regions (8) Tunnel Lengths for Both Regions are the Same Based on the Same Machine Lattice Tunnel Lengths for Both Regions are the Same Based on the Same Machine Lattice The Americas Region Used the Same Diameter TBM for Main Tunnel Drives and Drill and Blast Methods to Enlarge Enclosure Areas as Needed The Americas Region Used the Same Diameter TBM for Main Tunnel Drives and Drill and Blast Methods to Enlarge Enclosure Areas as Needed The European Region Uses a Larger Diameter TBM where Technical Equipment Requires a Larger Dimensional Space The European Region Uses a Larger Diameter TBM where Technical Equipment Requires a Larger Dimensional Space All Service Tunnels for Both Regions Use a Uniform Diameter TBM All Service Tunnels for Both Regions Use a Uniform Diameter TBM

16. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 16 1.7.1 Civil Engineering – Americas and European Regions (9) Americas Region European Region

17. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 17 1.7.1 Civil Engineering – Americas and European Regions (10) Americas Region Areas of Refuge are Provided Areas of Refuge are Provided All Non-TBM Construction is All Non-TBM Construction is Considered a Cavern Fire-Protected Connections are Fire-Protected Connections are Required for Shaft Access Volumes for Sources are Mostly Volumes for Sources are Mostly Considered BDS Americas Interaction Region Americas Interaction Region has a Larger Footprint Shaft Construction Extends to Shaft Construction Extends to Tunnel Floor Level Shaft Base Caverns do not Shaft Base Caverns do not Include Shaft Volumes European Region Areas of Refuge are Not Needed Areas of Refuge are Not Needed Some Minor Tunnel Widening is Some Minor Tunnel Widening is not Considered a Cavern Protected Shaft Access is not Protected Shaft Access is notRequired Volumes for Sources are Volumes for Sources are Considered as a % of Total European Interaction Region is European Interaction Region is More Compact Shaft Construction Extends to Shaft Construction Extends to Top of Base Cavern Shaft Base Caverns does Include Shaft Base Caverns does Include Shaft continuation Volumes

18. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 18 1.7.1 Civil Engineering – Americas and European Regions (11) Americas Region European Region

19. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 19 1.7.1 Civil Engineering – Americas and European Regions (12) Americas Region European Region

20. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 20 1.7.1 Civil Engineering – Americas and European Regions (13) Americas Region Surface Structure Summary and Typical Plan at Main Linac Shaft

21. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 21 1.7.2 Electrical – Americas Region (1) Americas Region KCS Power Load Table in MW

22. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 22 1.7.2 Electrical – Americas Region (2) Americas Region Electrical Single Line Diagram

23. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 23 1.7.2 Electrical – Americas Region (3) Americas Region Electrical Single Line Diagram at Central Region

24. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 24 1.7.3 Air Treatment – Americas Region (1) Two Separate Ducted Air Supply Systems Provide Conditioned Air to the Tunnel Enclosures Two Separate Ducted Air Supply Systems Provide Conditioned Air to the Tunnel Enclosures General Supply Air with 20% Fresh Air General Supply Air with 20% Fresh Air Emergency Supply Air to Areas of Refuge (AOR) When Needed Emergency Supply Air to Areas of Refuge (AOR) When Needed The Tunnel Enclosure Serves as the Air Return to Ducted Returns at Each ShaftThe Tunnel Enclosure Serves as the Air Return to Ducted Returns at Each Shaft Conditioned Supply Air will Maintain Tunnel Air Temperatures at 86 o F (30 o C) – Temperature Stability +/- 1 o CConditioned Supply Air will Maintain Tunnel Air Temperatures at 86 o F (30 o C) – Temperature Stability +/- 1 o C Damping Ring and BDS have Additional Fan Coil Units to Maintain Tunnel Temperature Due to Addition Heat Loading and Stricter Temperature Tolerances +/- 0.1 o CDamping Ring and BDS have Additional Fan Coil Units to Maintain Tunnel Temperature Due to Addition Heat Loading and Stricter Temperature Tolerances +/- 0.1 o C

25. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 25 1.7.3 Air Treatment – Americas Region (2) Americas Region Typical Air Treatment Schematic

26. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 26 1.7.4 Piped Utilities – Americas Region (1) Tunnel and Enclosure Groundwater Inflow and Condensate Drainage Estimated as 21 m 3 /h/km Tunnel and Enclosure Groundwater Inflow and Condensate Drainage Estimated as 21 m 3 /h/km Duplex Sumps Discharged Through Shafts Duplex Sumps Discharged Through Shafts 132 in Main Linac 132 in Main Linac 121 in Central Region and IR 121 in Central Region and IR 32 in Damping Ring 32 in Damping Ring Surface Holding Tanks will Provide Monitoring Capability Prior to DischargeSurface Holding Tanks will Provide Monitoring Capability Prior to Discharge Sprinkler Systems Throughout Underground Enclosures and Surface BuildingsSprinkler Systems Throughout Underground Enclosures and Surface Buildings Domestic Water and Sanitary Facilities Typically at the Base of Shafts and in Surface BuildingsDomestic Water and Sanitary Facilities Typically at the Base of Shafts and in Surface Buildings

27. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 27 1.7.5 Process Cooling Water – Americas Region (1) Americas Region KCS Heat Load Table by Area System in MW

28. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 28 1.7.5 Process Cooling Water – Americas Region (2) Americas Region Typical Process Cooling Water Schematic

29. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 29 1.7.5 Process Cooling Water – Americas Region (3) Americas Region Chilled Water Schematic at Central Region

30. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 30 1.7.7 Safety Equipment – Americas Region (1) Based on Requirements in National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard for Subterranean Spaces, 2005 Edition Based on Requirements in National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard for Subterranean Spaces, 2005 Edition Verified Single Main Linac Tunnel Solution Verified Single Main Linac Tunnel Solution Supported by Two Studies Conducted by Hughes Associates, Inc. Supported by Two Studies Conducted by Hughes Associates, Inc. Code Analysis and Recommendations Code Analysis and Recommendations Single Tunnel Analysis Using Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) which is a Computational Fluid Dynamics Program Developed by the USA National Institute of Standards Single Tunnel Analysis Using Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) which is a Computational Fluid Dynamics Program Developed by the USA National Institute of Standards Personnel EgressPersonnel Egress Hazardous Equipment and Shaft Elevators Protected by 2 hr. Fire Rated Walls and Doors Hazardous Equipment and Shaft Elevators Protected by 2 hr. Fire Rated Walls and Doors Main Linac Tunnel Serves as Escape Route Main Linac Tunnel Serves as Escape Route Emergency Lighting, Illuminated Exit Signage and Directional Signs Emergency Lighting, Illuminated Exit Signage and Directional Signs Automatic Sprinkler ProtectionAutomatic Sprinkler Protection Addressable Fire Detection SystemAddressable Fire Detection System

31. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 31 1.7.7 Safety Equipment – Americas Region (2) Plan Views at Shaft Base Caverns and Areas of Refuge

32. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 32 1.7.7 Safety Equipment – European Region (3) Based on European, French and Swiss Safety Requirements Based on European, French and Swiss Safety Requirements Single Main Linac Tunnel Solution Single Main Linac Tunnel Solution Avoiding Refuge Areas (Alcoves) Offering No Protected Exitway Avoiding Refuge Areas (Alcoves) Offering No Protected Exitway Transversal Ventilation System Transversal Ventilation System Tunnel Divided in Compartments Separated by Fire Doors and Fire Walls Every ~ 500m Tunnel Divided in Compartments Separated by Fire Doors and Fire Walls Every ~ 500m Negative Pressure Created in Compartment Affected by Fire, Positive Pressure in Adjacent Compartments Negative Pressure Created in Compartment Affected by Fire, Positive Pressure in Adjacent Compartments Prevention of Smoke Propagation from One Compartment to the Next Prevention of Smoke Propagation from One Compartment to the Next Emergency Lighting, Illuminated Exit Signage and Directional Signs Emergency Lighting, Illuminated Exit Signage and Directional Signs Extensive Fire Safety Study Conducted for CLIC, Applicable for ILC Extensive Fire Safety Study Conducted for CLIC, Applicable for ILC

33. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 33 Construction Schedule – Americas and European Regions e- BDS (3.33km) e+ BDS (2.25km) Courtesy M Gastal

34. Global Design Effort - CFS 13 December 2012 PAC Review - KEK 34 Summary Regional Conditions have had a Large Impact on the ILC Conventional Facilities Design Regional Conditions have had a Large Impact on the ILC Conventional Facilities Design In Both the Americas and European Regions Civil Design was Primarily Completed by In-House CFS Personnel Supported by Outside A/E Consultants In Both the Americas and European Regions Civil Design was Primarily Completed by In-House CFS Personnel Supported by Outside A/E Consultants In the Americas Region a Complete Mechanical and Electrical Design was Completed by Outside A/E Consultants Supported by CFS In-House Personnel In the Americas Region a Complete Mechanical and Electrical Design was Completed by Outside A/E Consultants Supported by CFS In-House Personnel Compared to the RDR the Overall Design Maturity has Greatly Improved in All Regions Compared to the RDR the Overall Design Maturity has Greatly Improved in All Regions