1. Jayhawkville Central High School
School Improvement Plan

2. Data Analysis for Jayhawkville Central High School

3. Summary of Data: The percentage of students performing at level 1 makes up the largest amount of all students at Central High School. The next largest percentage of students performed at level 2, followed by level 3 and then 4, with the smallest percentage of students. The District and state levels follow the same pattern. The percentage of scores at level 3 and 4 are higher at Central High School than the scores for the entire district. The scores at level 1 are highest for the district and lowest for the state. Scores at performance level 4 are highest at the state level and lowest at the district level. Performance level 3 scores are highest at the state level and lowest at the district level. Scores at Performance level 2 are highest at the state level, lowest at Central High School.
Further observations:
The amount of students in performing at levels 2 and 3 is about the same as the amount at level 1. This leaves a small portion at the top levels. The amount of students in level one at Central High is less than the overall amount of students in all of Jayhawkville, setting Central High as performing higher than the average in the district. Compared to all students in the state, there is a higher percentage of students at the level 1 performance level.

4. Summary of Data: The largest percentage of ELL Students at Central High School performed at level 1. The percentage of students are second largest at level 2, then level 3 comes in at the second lowest and no percentage of students performed at level 4. At the district and state levels the largest percentage of ELL Students fell in performance level 1. The highest percentage of students at level 2 and 3 are at Central High School.
Further Observations: The largest percent of student performance falls in level 1. Central High falls below the district level 1 performance and on par with the percentage of students in level 1 in the state. There is little variance between the building, district and state levels for ELL student performance.

5. SIP Rationale School focus on: test preparations
multicultural education
upper-level math skills
comprehensive writing skills
Improve science scores
Reach ALL students by:
Use of Exit tickets to track learning on a micro- level
Focus on English Learner Language (ELL) student proficiency
Align curriculum for science
Participate in regular Data team meetings to analyze data
Integrate Response To Intervention (RTI) strategies into classroom instruction and for students of focus.
SIP Rationale

6. Goals and Timeline for Implementation, Improvement, and Assessment

7. SMART Goal 1
During the school year, data from “exit tickets” will be used to target specific students for immediate intervention to ensure that 80% of students will score 85% or better on the end of unit science tests, that lead up to end of course exams.

8. SMART Goal 1 Timeline: Prior to the start of the 2018-2019 SY:
Curriculum alignment with assessments, exit tickets and End of Course (EOC) exam practice integrated throughout the year.
Throughout the SY:
Hold regular data team meetings to compare data from exit tickets, unit assessments and EOC exams to identify students of focus.
Implement use of RTI strategies
After the SY:
Analyze EOC data in data team meeting; revise school improvement plan (SIP) strategies for following school year.
SMART Goal 1 Timeline:

9. SMART Goal 2
During the school year, at least 60% of our beginner English Learner Language (ELL) students will improve English Language proficiency in all language domains as measured by a second administration of the district language proficiency assessments used to determine student placement at the beginning of the year.

10. SMART Goal 2 Timeline: At the start of the 2018-2019 SY:
Administer World-class Instructional Design and Assessment (WIDA) pre-assessment test
Gather data, sort students accordingly
Put interventions in place
Throughout the SY:
Administer daily English proficiency bell ringers
Monthly check tests with sample questions from WIDA test
At the end of the SY:
Administer WIDA assessment
Review data, analyze for improvement, pass data to teachers in next grade
SMART Goal 2 Timeline: