1. Team One Jack Galuardi – SMC/APT Corp Kurt Hogue – PEO-GCS-AMPV
Paul Snyder – Army CERDEC
Mark Gordon – OSD/Mfg Strategy
Melissa Malasmas – Pratt & Whitney
Angela Babian – AFRL/RXMS
Ali Al-Hamdani – AFRL/RXMS
Nathan Braaten – Boeing
Heather Calhoun – AMRDEC/PMO
Jeff Samples – BAE Systems
Jeremy Heiskanen – ODASD(SE)

2. MRL 1 – 4 Feedback
Is this effort Value added to the acquisition community?
Yes with comment
Recommended changes needed with proposed language
Yes (document details trends)
Identify the Issue/Concern and change recommended to address the issue
Too prescriptive, MRL 1 (and sometimes 2) too early, too complex
Retain the tone of the rest of the Matrix
Comments – green good, yellow tailored, red heck no!
Any Additional Comments of Thoughts on what needs to be added or how best to continue this effort

3. Additional Comments
Need to engage a much broader S&T stakeholder group
Need to see a draft for January

4. Standard SOW Feedback
Is this effort Value added to the acquisition community?
Yes
Recommended changes needed with propose language
Yes, see proposed changes made
Identify the Issue/Concern and change recommended to address the issue
See comments – Industry: Fewer shalls ($), avoid prescriptive language (How- Tos), Consistency in flow down reqts,
Comments were not rated

5. Comments or Thoughts Ask attendees for written feedback
Army has a list to provide
Add DMSMS clause under other
Add general manufacturing Safety/ESH clause under other
Instructions on “what can be tailored” (bold highlighted words)
Need to have sufficient agreed to shalls to make informed decisions

6. MRL Process What is working, what is not?
What parts of Deskbook are tailorable (i.e., assessment process, MMP, Reports, etc.)
What could make the MRL process better or more efficient?
Consistency in contracting approach, workforce development, and BOK material (Matrix, Deskbook, Users Guide)
What should the MRL WG concentrate on during 2019?
Focus on training to examine current state and future state
Planning, funding, availability, etc.