Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CTD SVP’s Compared to GDEM

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CTD SVP’s Compared to GDEM"— Presentation transcript:

1 CTD SVP’s Compared to GDEM
LT Nick A. Vares OC 3570 SUMMER 2001

2

3

4 Overview NAVO data Gulf of the Farallones NAVO generated GDEM
Variations in time and space of SVP’s Actual vs model SVP’s

5 Motivation SVP data important input for mine and submarine acoustic detection models GDEM is a good starting point Actual SVP data required for effective tactical actions

6

7 Station 1 26-hour T/S Greatest mixed layer variation
Surface heating causes mixed layer shallowing Surface cooling causes mixed layer deepening

8

9

10 Station 2 26-hour T/S Mixed layer below 20 meters
Small mixed layer variation Higher surface temperatures

11

12

13 Spatial survey 5.5 days Across mouth of San Francisco Bay

14

15 GDEM Climatology of 70 years data
Half degree resolution for majority of globe Better resolution for hot spots Master Oceanographic Observation Data Set Naval Interactive Data Analysis System

16

17 Conclusions Diurnal shallowing and deepening of mixed layer
GDEM is an average Averages seldom match single samples Means similar in shape and velocities Standard deviation greatest in upper 50 meters

18 Station 1 – Blue Station 2 – Green Spatial Survey – Magenta

19 Station 1 – Blue Station 2 – Green Spatial Survey – Magenta

20 Questions?


Download ppt "CTD SVP’s Compared to GDEM"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google