1. Comparison of DNA extraction methods.
Comparison of DNA extraction methods. (A) Experimental design. Human feces, pig feces, and hospital sewage were extracted using seven different DNA extraction methods (Table 1): InnuPure C16, MagNA Pure LC DNA isolation kit III, Easy-DNA gDNA purification kit, MP FastDNA Spin kit, PowerSoil DNA isolation kit, QIAamp DNA stool minikit, and QIAamp DNA stool minikit plus bead beating (for details, see Materials and Methods). DNA concentration, purity, and stability were examined, and microbial community composition was determined using 16S rRNA gene profiling and metagenomics (selected samples). (B) DNA from each method was dissolved in 100 µl solution, and DNA concentrations were determined using Qubit dsDNA BR assay kit measurements. Values represent averages from duplicate or triplicate DNA extractions (see also Table S1A in the supplemental material). (C) Ecological richness (Chao 1) and diversity (Shannon index) were determined based on contingency tables from 16S rRNA gene profiling and metagenomic sequencing data at OTU and species levels, respectively (see also Table S1B).
Berith E. Knudsen et al. mSystems 2016; doi: /mSystems