1. Assessing Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) In Indonesia
Coraltriangleinitiative.org
(Wilson and Green, 2009)
(Wiadnya, 2012)
Assessing Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)
In Indonesia
Supervisor: Jan van Tatenhove
Presented by:
Group 1
(A. Capriati, A.S. Bauchet, B. Wolkenfelt, C. Blazy, D. Coskun and P. Koletsi)
Wageningen University, 9 October 2015
Marine System (AEW22806)

2. Outline Introduction Tool to assess the effectiveness of MPA
Discussion an assessment of MPA in Indonesia
Conclusion and Recommendation
Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
2/22/2019

3. 2006 Indonesian President, SBY – 20 Millions Ha MPA- 2020
Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
2/22/2019

4. Significant interest of
Marine Protected Areas
248 MPAs
(World Database Protected Area, 2010) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
2/22/2019

5. “Status” Coral Triangle MPAs
Marine Protected Area
*Handoko, 2014
“Status” Coral Triangle MPAs
IUCN:
“a clearly defined geographical space, recognized, dedicated and management, through legal or other effective means to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values ”
Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
2/22/2019

6. Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
Why most of MPA in
Level 1 ???
Source: (MMAF, 2013)
Not effective
Partly Effective
Effective minimally
Effective Optimally
Effective sustainably
86.02%
Level 1
Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
2/22/2019

7. Research Question
How to assess an MPA while taking all important aspects into account ?
Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
2/22/2019

8. Related each other Tools to assess the effectiveness of MPA Objectives
Ecological
Socio-economic
Governance (effective)
Pomeroy et al., 2005 1
Biological diversity protected 2
Habitat Protected 3
Degraded areas restored
Livelihood enhanced
MPA benefits equitably
Environmental awareness and knowledge enhanced
stakeholders portion and participation
local people and/or NGOs involvement
legal structures and strategies
Indicators
Related each other
Existence of management plan
Stakeholders: participation and level
Fish abundance and diversity
Coral cover
Area showing signs of recovery
New alternative livelihood
Understanding of human impact
Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
2/22/2019

9. Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
Discussion
Sample site/study area
Karimunjawa
National Park (KNP)
Province: East Java
Area Wide: ha
27 islands (22 inside the KNP)
9,000 people living in villages
Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
2/22/2019

10. Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
Discussion
New zoning plan of Karimunjawa in 2005
(Campbell et.al, 2012)
- No take zone : ( Core zone + protection zone)
Traditional fishing utilization zone
Tourism zone
Rehabilitation zone
Mariculture zone
Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
2/22/2019

11. Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
Discussion
Aspect
Success
Intermediate
Failure
Ecological
Coral reef habitat (deep zone)
Restriction on unsustainable fishing
Declining of fish biomass (targeted fish)
Socio-economic
New alternative livelihood (eco-tourism, mariculture)
Increase of awareness of spatial, species and gear restriction
Restriction on unsustainable fishing
Dependency on fisheries
Governance
High involvement of the local community (co-management)
Limitation of the conflicts (stakeholders and communities)
Low community ranger patrol
Poor enforcement of the new regulations
No compliance with spatial restrictions
Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
2/22/2019

12. Why does it difficult to give a relevant Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
Discussion
Why does it difficult to give a relevant
assessment of an MPA?
1. Different point of view from different assessors
2. Vast indicators and parameters to assess a MPA
3. Lack of information and time for deep analysis
Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
2/22/2019

13. Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
Conclusion
Main drivers for assessing a successful MPA are: time series data on biological aspect and co-management between government, stakeholders and local communities.
Recommendation
Annual monitoring on biological aspects and combine all the indicators (ecological, socio-economic and governance) to assess the effectiveness of MPA.
Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
2/22/2019

14. Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
Thank You
Group 1 (MPA)
A. Capriati, A.S. Bauchet, B. Wolkenfelt, C. Blazy, D. Coskun and P. Koletsi
Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
2/22/2019

15. Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
Questions ?
Case Study (MPA) by Group 1*
2/22/2019