1. Section Outline Unintentional Torts Negligence Strict Liability
Elements of Negligence
Defenses to Negligence
Strict Liability

2. Unintentional Torts
A person can commit an unintentional tort, when he or she acts in a careless manner that results in an injury to a person, damage to property, or both.
Negligence and strict liability are unintentional torts.

3. Intentional and Unintentional Torts
4.2
Intentional and Unintentional Torts
Torts
Intentional Torts
Unintentional Torts
When a person commits a wrong against another and knows and desires the consequences of his or her act.
When acting in a careless manner causes damage or injury.
Examples
Examples
Assault and Battery
Trespass
False imprisonment
Negligence
Strict liability

4. Unintentional Torts
Negligence is an accidental or unintentional tort resulting because of the failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonable person would have exercised in the same circumstances.

5. Unintentional Torts
Strict liability is the doctrine that states that people engaged in ultrahazardous activities will be held liable, regardless of how careful they were and regardless of their intent.

6. Negligence is an accidental or unintentional tort.
is the tort that most often occurs in society today.

7. Elements of Negligence
duty of care
breach of duty
proximate cause
actual harm

8. Duty of Care
All of us have a duty not to violate certain rights of others.
The plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant owed him or her duty of care.

9. Example of Duty of Care
Julia was injured while diving at a public pool. The injury could have been avoided if the diving board had a guardrail. Julia sued the state’s Department of Health.

10. Example of Duty of Care
The court ruled the Department of Health had a duty to the state’s sanitary code, not a duty to inspect for safety problems. The Department of Health had no duty to Julia.

11. Breach of Duty
Breach of duty is the failure to use the degree of care that a reasonable person would exercise in that same situation.
The words “reasonable person” must be used when instructing the jurors.

12. Proximate Cause
Proximate cause is the legal connection between unreasonable conduct and the resulting harm.
Without proximate cause, the result would not have occurred.

13. Actual Harm
The essence of any tort suit is a violation of a duty that results in injury to the plaintiff.
The plaintiff must have actually suffered physical injury, property damage, or financial loss.

14. Defenses to Negligence
contributory negligence
comparative negligence
assumption of risk

15. Contributory Negligence
Behavior by the plaintiff that helps cause his or her injuries may be considered contributory negligence.

16. Comparative Negligence
The negligence of each party is compared under the doctrine of comparative negligence, and the amount of the plaintiff’s recovery is reduced by the percent of his or her negligence.

17. Assumption of Risk
If the defendant can show the plaintiff knew of the risk involved and still took the chance of being injured, he or she may claim assumption of risk.

18. Strict Liability
Some activities are so dangerous that the law will apply neither the principles of negligence nor the rules of intentional torts to them.

19. Strict Liability
According to strict liability, if these activities injure someone or damage property, the people engaged in the activities will be held liable, regardless of how careful they were and regardless of their intent.