1. Stat Chat Advancing Recommendations for the Statistics Pathway
Helen Burn
Co-Chair, Washington Math Pathways to Completion
2-3 pm, March 2 and 9, 2018

2. Webinar on current issues with Math& 146 June 2017
Webinar on transfer issues with BIs July 2017
Convening to examine course objectives Aug 2017
Survey on course content recommendations Oct 2017
- agreement on need to do this
- content areas identified were comprehensive
- many missing broad understanding and study design
- clarification wanted on probability, binomial theorem, hypothesis testing Math& 146 content recommendations circulated Nov 2017
Vetting and Professional Development - Stat Chat today
Switched positions of recommendations 4 and 5 just for space issues on slides--

3. Today’s agenda
15 minutes – your thoughts on how to further advance/clarify content expectations around probability, binomial theorem, and hypothesis testing
20 minutes – Amber Mozeleski –Math& 146 at Tacoma Community College
20 minutes – discussion of co-requisite models
The meeting will be recorded and forwarded to the math listserve.
(page 4-5, handout): “why does this recommendation need to be implemented?”
(e.g., How can it be clearer or more accurate? How might we make a stronger or more compelling case?)

4. Community Agreement
Think of the system rather than your personal preference
Engage someone’s idea before moving onto the next idea
Evidence-based ideas over personal preference
Feel free to submit ideas via
(page 4-5, handout): “why does this recommendation need to be implemented?”
(e.g., How can it be clearer or more accurate? How might we make a stronger or more compelling case?)

5. Content Recommendations
(page 4-5, handout): “why does this recommendation need to be implemented?”
(e.g., How can it be clearer or more accurate? How might we make a stronger or more compelling case?)

6. Amber Mozeleski Tacoma Community College
Selected because TCC’s Math& 146 contains all content areas, including “Big 5” hypothesis testing
Prerequisite for the course is intermediate algebra that meets UW’s Math 98 expectation
10 minutes – describing the course
10 minutes – your questions
(page 4-5, handout): “why does this recommendation need to be implemented?”
(e.g., How can it be clearer or more accurate? How might we make a stronger or more compelling case?)

7. Co-requisite discussion
Highline and other colleges are interested
Benefits of building a consortium
(quality and funding)
We would be wise to engage co-requisites as a system
15 minutes – discussion
5 minutes – next steps
(page 4-5, handout): “why does this recommendation need to be implemented?”
(e.g., How can it be clearer or more accurate? How might we make a stronger or more compelling case?)

8. Thank you for your time and effort
Stat Chat recording and meeting summary will be circulated
Consider StatPREP workshop at Highline College June 15-16, statprep.org/seattletacoma
Same time next week!
(page 4-5, handout): “why does this recommendation need to be implemented?”
(e.g., How can it be clearer or more accurate? How might we make a stronger or more compelling case?)