1. Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages 290-300 (February 2018)
Key Steps in Conducting Systematic Reviews for Underpinning Clinical Practice Guidelines: Methodology of the European Association of Urology 
Thomas Knoll, Muhammad Imran Omar, Steven Maclennan, Virginia Hernández, Steven Canfield, Yuhong Yuan, Max Bruins, Lorenzo Marconi, Hein Van Poppel, James N’Dow, Richard Sylvester 
European Urology 
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
DOI: /j.eururo
Copyright © Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1 The process of conducting systematic review.
GRADE=Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2 Example of search strategy. exp=“exploded” the subject heading.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Example Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses flowchart [21].
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 4
A decision flow diagram when to meta-analyse data or to use narrative synthesis.
NRS=nonrandomised studies; RCT=randomised controlled trials; RoB=risk of bias.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © Terms and Conditions

6. Fig. 5
The process of assessing the quality of evidence with GRADE approach.
EtD=Evidence to Decision; GRADE=Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; HTA=Health technology assessment; RCT=randomised controlled trials; SoF=Summary of Findings.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © Terms and Conditions