Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Negligible T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU biodistribution or toxicity on non‐tumor tissues Negligible T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU biodistribution or toxicity on non‐tumor tissues AUndetectable.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Negligible T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU biodistribution or toxicity on non‐tumor tissues Negligible T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU biodistribution or toxicity on non‐tumor tissues AUndetectable."— Presentation transcript:

1 Negligible T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU biodistribution or toxicity on non‐tumor tissues
Negligible T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU biodistribution or toxicity on non‐tumor tissues AUndetectable T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU emitted fluorescence in normal tissues, except for a transient accumulation 5 h after a 100 μg dose in the liver, which disappears at 24 h. Liver emitted fluorescence is transient and significantly lower than the one registered in tumor tissue. Tumor/Liver ratio = 7.5 (see tumor intensity in Fig 2B, which was registered in the same experiment; N = 5 mice/group). Scale bar, 1 cm. Color key, radiant efficiency units.BRepresentative images depicting the level of DNA double‐strand break (DSB) induction in histologically normal bone marrow 5 h after treatment, as measured by anti‐γ‐H2AX, which is higher in free oligo‐FdU‐treated mice than in T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU (P = 0.047). Low level of cells containing DSBs in histologically normal kidney after T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU or free oligo‐FdU treatment, a finding occurring in all normal tissues analyzed (N = 50, 5 mice/group; 10 fields/mouse). Scale bar, 100 μm.CRepresentative images showing lack of histopathological alterations in H&E‐stained tissue or apoptotic induction in H&E‐stained samples of CXCR4+ (bone marrow) and CXCR4− (brain, kidney, liver, lung, and heart) normal tissues 24 h after the administration of a 100 μg dose of T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU or an equimolecular dose of free oligo‐FdU (N = 5/group). Note that the transient nanoconjugate distribution to liver or the DNA damage induced in bone marrow does not lead to cytotoxicity on these non‐tumor tissues (N = 50, 5 mice/group; 10 fields/mouse). Scale bar, 100 μm.DLack of differences in body weight among groups registered along time in the SW1417‐derived CCR model and the regression of metastases protocol (mean ± s.e.m., N = 10 mice/group).ELack of differences in body mouse weight among groups registered along time in the SW1417 cell line‐derived model and the prevention of metastasis protocol [mean ± s.e.m., Buffer (N = 11; free oligo‐FdU (N = 12), T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU (N = 12)].FLack of differences in body mouse weight among groups registered along time in the M5 patient‐derived model and the prevention of metastasis protocol [mean ± s.e.m., Buffer (N = 6); free oligo‐FdU (N = 17); T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU (N = 8)]. María Virtudes Céspedes et al. EMBO Mol Med. 2018;emmm © as stated in the article, figure or figure legend


Download ppt "Negligible T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU biodistribution or toxicity on non‐tumor tissues Negligible T22‐GFP‐H6‐FdU biodistribution or toxicity on non‐tumor tissues AUndetectable."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google