1. CCSD Induction Program Overview and Evaluation January 19, 2015

2. Background and Perspective
Prior to
District-Based Mentoring Program
District-Based Mentoring Program for 2nd Year Teachers, Full-Release Induction Coaches Through i3 Consortium for 1st Year Teachers
All 1st and 2nd Year Teachers Participate in the i3 Induction Consortium

3. Induction Program Overview
Consortium Data:
248 First/Second Year Teachers
21 School Districts
17 Induction Coaches

4. Induction Program Overview
CCSD Teachers Supported by Consortium:
21 First Year Teachers
26 Second Year Teachers

5. Induction Program Overview
CCSD Teachers Supported by Consortium:
21 First Year Teachers
26 Second Year Teachers

6. Induction Program Overview
CCSD’s 47 First/Second Year Teachers are Served by 7 Induction Coaches (2 from CCSD)
All CCSD Principals Have Attended the Professional Learning Session “Accelerating New Teacher Success”

7. Induction Program Overview
First Year Beginning Teacher Network Sessions (4 Sessions are Offered Throughout the Year:
September 3, 2014: 90% Participation
October 1, 2014: 85% Participation
**Diane Trpkosh is a Co-Facilitator of the Sessions

8. Induction Program Overview
CCSD Induction Consortium Team:
Jamie Coquyt, Tracy Schipper, Laura Medberry, Kendra Hanzlik, Diane Trpkosh
Attend 2 Induction Consortium Network Meetings
Meet Quarterly On-Site with Kim Owen, GWAEA Induction Consortium Lead, to Evaluate Programming Needs

9. Induction Program Overview
GWAEA Induction Consortium Steering Committee:
Laura Medberry is Serving as the Elementary Principal Representative for the Consortium
Laura is Also Serving as a National Teacher Induction Network Team Member

10. Induction Program Evaluation

13. Beginning Teacher Data
My induction coach aligns our work with my district priorities and expectations
1st Year Teachers – 98%
2nd Year Teachers – 96%

14. Beginning Teacher Data
What has been the most important impact your induction coach has made on your teaching practice?
1st Year Teachers:
Classroom Management
Planning Instruction
Emotional Support
2nd Year Teachers:
Emotional Support/Classroom Management
Analysis of Student Work

15. What we have learned: Induction Coaches:
Clear goals/focus/agenda for interactions
More work on lesson planning
Efficient use of our time together

16. College Interaction Data
September – Mid-December:
15 face-to-face interactions with each NT meeting goal of at least weekly f2f interactions
Average time/f2f interactions/NT = 73 minutes —meeting goal of minutes/f2f interaction
Total for 1st semester: 49, 315 minutes (821.9 hours) supporting NTs at College CSD
Participation in High Leverage tool usage:
100% (45) NTs have engaged in work with their induction coach on the following:
Analysis of Student Work
Lesson Planning
Observation Cycles
Co-Assessment Processes