Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Differential effects of sevoflurane on the metastatic potential and chemosensitivity of non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma and renal cell carcinoma in vitro 

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Differential effects of sevoflurane on the metastatic potential and chemosensitivity of non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma and renal cell carcinoma in vitro "— Presentation transcript:

1 Differential effects of sevoflurane on the metastatic potential and chemosensitivity of non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma and renal cell carcinoma in vitro  S. Ciechanowicz, H. Zhao, Q. Chen, J. Cui, E. Mi, E. Mi, Q. Lian, D. Ma  British Journal of Anaesthesia  Volume 120, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018) DOI: /j.bja Copyright © Terms and Conditions

2 Fig 1 Sevoflurane inhibited cell viability of A549 cells. (A) Alamar Blue reduction of naïve, control and sevoflurane-treated A549 cells at 24 h post gas exposure (n=3). (B) Alamar Blue absorbance after inhibition of TGF-βRI/II with LY (LY21) at 24h post gas exposure (n=3). (C) Wound healing at 24 h post sevoflurane exposure in cultures with and without 24 h of 40 μM DDP treatment. Images are X4 magnification. Dashed-line indicates initial wound at t = 0h. (D) Wound/gap closure expressed as percentage remaining wound area at 24h post gas exposure. 24h data naive (n=4), control (n=4), sevo (n=4), naive + DDP (n=3), control + DDP (n=3), sevo + DDP (n=3). N=number of independent experiments. (E) Wound healing after siRNA knockdown of TGF-β1 and OPN at 24h post gas exposure (n=6). SSi=scramble RNA negative control, TSi=TGF-β1 SiRNA-treated, OSi=OPN SiRNA-treated. Data are expressed as mean (SEM) and analysed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. British Journal of Anaesthesia  , DOI: ( /j.bja ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions

3 Fig 2 Effect of sevoflurane on TGF-β1 expression in A549 cells. TGF-β1 expression in A549 cells detected by immunofluorescence staining. Mean fluorescent intensity is displayed as a box and whisker plot with mean plus or minus upper and lower limits (n=6). Data are expressed as mean (SEM) and analysed using Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's post hoc test. British Journal of Anaesthesia  , DOI: ( /j.bja ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions

4 Fig 3 Sevoflurane exposure enhanced nuclear Smad3 expression in A549 cells. (A) Nuclear Smad3 expression in DDP-treated A549 cells as detected by immunofluorescence staining at 24 h post sevoflurane exposure. Fluorescent intensity of Smad3 displayed as a box-and-whisker plot with mean upper and lower limits. Naive + DDP (n=3), Control + DDP (n=3) Sevo + DDP (n=4). Data were analysed with Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's post hoc test. ***P<0.001. British Journal of Anaesthesia  , DOI: ( /j.bja ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions

5 Fig 4 Sevoflurane promoted cell viability, chemoresistance and migration of RCC4 cells. (A) Alamar Blue reduction of control and sevoflurane-treated RCC4 cells with and without treatment with DDP at 24 h post gas exposure. (B) Alamar Blue absorbance after LY21 treatment at 24 h post gas exposure, (C) Wound healing at 24h post sevoflurane exposure in cultures with and without 24h of 40 μM DDP treatment. Images are X4 magnification. Dashed-line indicates initial wound at t = 0h. (D) Wound/gap closure expressed as percentage remaining wound area at 24 h post gas exposure. (E) Wound healing after siRNA knockdown of TGF-β1 and OPN at 24h post gas exposure (n=3). SSi=scramble RNA, TSi=TGF-β1 siRNA-treated, OSi=OPN siRNA-treated. Data expressed as mean (SEM) and analysed using ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. British Journal of Anaesthesia  , DOI: ( /j.bja ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions

6 Fig 5 Sevoflurane increased TGF-β1 and OPN expression in RCC4 cells. (A) TGF-β1 expression in RCC4 cells was detected by immunofluorescence staining at 24h post sevoflurane exposure. Fluorescent intensity of TGF-β1 displayed as a box-and-whisker plot with mean plus or minus upper and lower limits. Naive (n=3), Control (n=4), Sevo (n=4). (B) OPN in RCC4 cells was detected by immunofluorescence staining at 24 h post sevoflurane exposure. Fluorescent intensity of OPN displayed as a box-and-whisker plot with mean plus or minus upper and lower limits (n=4). Data were analysed with Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's post hoc test. ***P<0.001. British Journal of Anaesthesia  , DOI: ( /j.bja ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions

7 Fig 6 Sevoflurane enhanced TGF-βRII and reduced nuclear Smad3 expression in RCC4 cells. (A) TGF-βRII expression in DPP-treated RCC4 cells was detected by immunofluorescence staining at 24 h post sevoflurane exposure. Fluorescent intensity of TGF-βRII displayed as box-and-whisker plot with mean plus or minus upper and lower limits. Naive + DDP (n=3), Control + DDP (n=4), Sevo + DDP (n=4). (B) Nuclear Smad3 expression in DDP-treated RCC4 cells was detected by immunofluorescence staining at 24 h post sevoflurane exposure. Fluorescent intensity of Smad3 displayed as a box-and-whisker plot with mean plus or minus upper and lower limits. Naive + DDP (n=4), Control + DDP (n=4), Sevo + DDP (n=3). Data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis with post hoc Dunn's test. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. British Journal of Anaesthesia  , DOI: ( /j.bja ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Differential effects of sevoflurane on the metastatic potential and chemosensitivity of non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma and renal cell carcinoma in vitro "

Similar presentations


Ads by Google