1. “ROYAL TYPEWRITER”
“ALLY DOCTRINE:” Allies of a struck er not protected by 8(b)(4)
a person who does work that it would not do but for the strike and benefits from strike
knowledge of the strike
existence of work
pickets
payment
work done by ally must have been done by primary ees
primary er must pay for work (direct or indirect)
arrangement initiated and devised by primary employer
AN “ALLY” IS NOT “WHOLLY UNCONCERNED”

2. 8(b)(4) Dilemma
TENSION BETWEEN WORDING OF 8(b)(4) AND PURPOSE OF 8(b)(4)
WORDING: COULD BE CONSTRUED TO LIMIT “PRIMARY” ACTIVITY
PURPOSE: AIMED AT “SECONDARY ACTIVITY”
PICKETING OF INDEPENDENTS IN “ROYAL TYPEWRITER” WITHIN WORDING, BUT NOT PURPOSE, OF 8(b)(4).

3. “ROYAL TYPEWRITER” (CONTINUED)
PICKETING MUST BE DIRECTED TOWARDS EMPLOYEES
Prohibited Means - inducing or encouraging employees not to work
Prohibited Object - “cease doing business”
PICKETING OF CUSTOMERS NOT UNLAWFUL BECAUSE IT DID NOT INDUCE EMPLOYEES NOT TO WORK

4. Procedure in 8(b)(4) Cases
Section 10(l)
Priority Handling
Injunction Request to District Court