Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Least-squares Joint Imaging of Primaries and Multiples

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Least-squares Joint Imaging of Primaries and Multiples"— Presentation transcript:

1 Least-squares Joint Imaging of Primaries and Multiples
Morgan Brown Stanford University 2002 SEG, Salt Lake City Stanford Exploration Project Brown

2 A Stack of the Primaries...
Stanford Exploration Project Brown

3 …and a Stack of the Multiples
Stanford Exploration Project Brown

4 CMP gathers are also consistent
primaries multiples Stanford Exploration Project Brown

5 What information can multiples add?
At least redundant: Related AVO behavior Similar structural image Different illumination: Near offsets Shadow zones Stanford Exploration Project Brown

6 How to exploit the information?
Constraint on existing information Integrate additional information Three requirements: Image self-consistency Consistency with data Simplicity of images Stanford Exploration Project Brown

7 The Gameplan Imaging: “NMO for Multiples” Constraint/Integration:
Regularized least-squares inversion Synthetic & Real data tests Stanford Exploration Project Brown

8 NMO for multiples - kinematics
Stanford Exploration Project Brown

9 NMO for multiples - kinematics
Building a pseudo-primary t’ S R 1 t’ t Stanford Exploration Project Brown

10 NMO for multiples - kinematics
Building a pseudo-primary t’ S R 2 t’ t Stanford Exploration Project Brown

11 NMO for multiples - kinematics
Building a pseudo-primary t’ S R 3 t’ t Stanford Exploration Project Brown

12 NMO for multiples - kinematics
Building a pseudo-primary t’ S R 4 t’ t Stanford Exploration Project Brown

13 NMO for multiples - kinematics
Building a pseudo-primary t’ S R t’ t Dx Stanford Exploration Project Brown

14 NMO for multiples - kinematics
primary NMO for multiple 1 Effective RMS velocity Stanford Exploration Project Brown

15 NMO for multiples - kinematics
Stanford Exploration Project Brown

16 Modeling Amplitudes: Assumptions
Constant AVO WB reflection. Free surface R.C. = -1. Ignore geometric spreading. Ignoring primary AVO: multi (-r)i*prim AVO: more later. Stanford Exploration Project Brown

17 Forward Modeling Equation
NMO0 d m0 Stanford Exploration Project Brown

18 Forward Modeling Equation
(-r)*NMO1 d m1 Stanford Exploration Project Brown

19 Forward Modeling Equation
(-r)2*NMO2 d m2 Stanford Exploration Project Brown

20 Forward Modeling Equation
Ni :adjoint of NMO for multiple i. Ri : (-r)iI. mi : pseudo-primary panel i. d : input CMP gather. Stanford Exploration Project Brown

21 Least-squares objective function
Stanford Exploration Project Brown

22 Least-squares objective function
Stanford Exploration Project Brown

23 Image Simplicity and Crosstalk
Ideally, the “simplest” model... N0m0 + N1R1m1 + N2R2m2 “inverse” d m0 m1 m2 Stanford Exploration Project Brown

24 Model Simplicity and Crosstalk
…but this problem is underdetermined. N0m0 + N1R1m1 + N2R2m2 “inverse” d m0 m1 m2 Stanford Exploration Project Brown

25 Discriminating between crosstalk and signal
Self-consistent, flat primaries Stanford Exploration Project Brown

26 Discriminating between crosstalk and signal
Inconsistent, curved crosstalk Stanford Exploration Project Brown

27 Model Regularization suppresses crosstalk
Dm= Difference between pseudo-primary panels. Penalizes inconsistent crosstalk events. Dx= Difference along offset. Penalizes curving events. e1,e2 = Scalar regularization parameters. Stanford Exploration Project Brown

28 Dm: Modeling AVO of multiples
No explicit AVO modeling Model relative primary/multiple AVO dependence. Dm differences at different offsets. Stanford Exploration Project Brown

29 Dm: Modeling AVO of multiples
From forward model Mult(h) ~ prim(hp) * (-r) hp S R t’ h t Stanford Exploration Project Brown

30 Dm: Modeling AVO of multiples
In constant velocity: hp S R t’ h t Stanford Exploration Project Brown

31 Dm: Modeling AVO of multiples
In constant velocity: Curves: hp(t) - - m0 m1 Stanford Exploration Project Brown

32 Synthetic Data Results
Raw primaries Raw mult. 1 Raw mult. 2 Stanford Exploration Project Brown

33 Synthetic Data Results
Est. primaries Est. mult. 1 Est. mult. 2 x(-r) x(-r 2) Stanford Exploration Project Brown

34 Synthetic Data Results
Raw primaries Est. primaries Difference Stanford Exploration Project Brown

35 Synthetic Data #2 Results
Raw primaries Est. primaries Difference Stanford Exploration Project Brown

36 Real Data Results Raw primaries Est. primaries Difference
Stanford Exploration Project Brown

37 Strengths Good separation…. Amplitude-preserving process
...at near offsets …without a prior noise model Amplitude-preserving process General integration framework Stanford Exploration Project Brown

38 Weaknesses 1-D earth. Amplitudes - Incomplete Modeling?
Parameter sensitivity… …e1, e2, r, velocity. Multiples coherent across offset. NMO stretch. Stanford Exploration Project Brown

39 The Future Migration…tougher battle, richer spoils
Different illumination Amplitudes? Converted waves (PS,PSP). “Tall” operator. One image, many datasets. Prior wavefield separation. Stanford Exploration Project Brown

40 Acknowledgements ExxonMobil, WesternGeco for data.
Biondo Biondi, Bob Clapp, Antoine Guitton. Stanford Exploration Project Brown


Download ppt "Least-squares Joint Imaging of Primaries and Multiples"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google