Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A Real Options Logic for Initiating Technology Positioning Investments

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A Real Options Logic for Initiating Technology Positioning Investments"— Presentation transcript:

1 A Real Options Logic for Initiating Technology Positioning Investments
Rita Gunther McGrath Academy of Management Review, 1997 Youngsoo Kim, October 9, 2013

2 Objective Specify how boundary conditions and uncertainty influences the value of technology options Take a strategic perspective on uncertainty itself, arguing that value can be amplified by investments to shift boundaries

3 Technology Positioning Projects Generate Real Options
Financial options vs. Technology options Difference: core assumptions for pricing Similarity: volatility and option price Technical and External uncertainty Timing dilemmas: early mover or second follower Technical uncertainty makes option approach more attractive to the firm

4 Technology Positioning Projects Generate Real Options
Value of the Option to Wait

5 Technology Positioning Projects Generate Real Options
Uncertainty and Value of Option to Wait Conventional NPV rule 0.5 * 180 – 100 = –10 Wait and see 0.5 * (180 – 100) = 40 Amplifying Pre-investments If the lobbyists could guarantee favorable rules 180 – (0.5 * * 100) – 10 = 95 Firms need to influence key legal boundary conditions rather than by investing in technology itself

6 Effects of Boundary Conditions on Variance of Net Returns and Option Value

7 Boundary Conditions and Uncertainty – Two Factors to Determine the Cumulative Returns
Size of Rent Demand: Hard to predict ex ante, but possible to identify attractive demand structures Ameliorate widespread vs. Cure 1 over 100,000 Speed of adoption: The slower the adoption rates, the smaller the cumulative returns Delay in revenue inflow, Much room for competitors Blocking: Blocking reduces the value of the option Expropriation: Similar effects as blocking

8 Boundary Conditions and Uncertainty – Two Factors to Determine the Cumulative Returns
Sustainability of Rent Matching: Rent streams are appropriated under matching – not through imitation but through substitution Likelihood of matching are influenced by three factors: (1) motivation and capacity of rivals, (2) customer immobilities, and (3) order of entry and lock-out effects Imitation: Increases supply of a product, thereby decreasing its scarcity and, thence, price One solution to imitation problem: Take tight appropriability regimes for organizational assets as patents, trademarks, and copyrights

9 Boundary Conditions and Commercialization Costs
Costs for commercialization of technology Investments in production assets: The more asset intensive the project, the more expensive it is likely to be (Greer & Moses, 1992) Accessibility to necessary infrastructure: To the extent that the availability of such infrastructures is uncertain, expected costs of commercialization and their variance will be greater, setting a lower boundary on the option value Availability of parallel technologies: Creating complementary assets can be both costly and uncertain, increasing the variance of the cost

10 Factors Influencing Price of the Option: Development Cost
Spillover effects Investments intended to create new knowledge for the firm often have important spillover effects A firm amplifies spillover benefits when it utilizes the developing technology as a springboard to target other markets Life cycle During periods of incremental change, learning is “exploited”; however, during periods of disruption, investments in “exploration” must be made

11 Rent streams, commercialization cost, and their relationship to technology option value


Download ppt "A Real Options Logic for Initiating Technology Positioning Investments"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google