1. Accuracy and test–retest precision of quantitative cartilage morphology on a 1.0T peripheral magnetic resonance imaging system 
D. Inglis, Ph.D., M. Pui, M.D., G. Ioannidis, M.Sc., K. Beattie, Ph.D., P. Boulos, M.D., M.Sc., J.D. Adachi, M.D., C.E. Webber, Ph.D., F. Eckstein, M.D. 
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
DOI: /j.joca
Copyright © 2006 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1 ONI Medical Systems, Inc., OrthOne 1.0T peripheral MRI scanner.
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage  , DOI: ( /j.joca )
Copyright © 2006 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
1.0T graphical scan planning: (a) FSE coronal scout, (b) FSE sagittal scout, (c) FSE axial scout, (d) final coronal 3DGRE fat-sat. Axial reference lines (red) and final coronal slice reference (yellow).
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage  , DOI: ( /j.joca )
Copyright © 2006 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Example of image segmentation for a K–L grade 2 subject. First slice included in condylar ROI: (a) 1.0T, (b) 1.5T. Last slice included: (c) 1.0T, (d) 1.5T. Segmentation boundaries (green, magenta) shown.
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage  , DOI: ( /j.joca )
Copyright © 2006 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions