Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLydia Townsend Modified over 6 years ago
1
The radiative properties of inhomogeneous cirrus clouds
Steven Dobbie Sat Ghosh Leeds Peter Jonas UMIST
2
Motivation Climate - radiative properties and cloud feedbacks, distribution of H2O Weather – Moisture distribution, precip, surface temperature Aerosols – distributions and processing Heterogeneous chemistry Satellite retrievals
3
Motivation Cirrus cloud structure (1, 2-3, 5, 20 km)
Smith and Jonas, ‘96, ‘97 Quante et al., ‘96 Demoz et al., ‘96 Gultepe and Starr, ‘95 Starr et al., ‘92 Starr and Cox, ‘85
4
Clouds in GCMs Prognostic water schemes
5
More motivation GCSS WG2 (Starr et al 2000)
6
Emerald case
7
Water Vap Diffusivity
10
Chilbolton case LEM 10.00 09.00 09.30
12
What effect does 3D radiation
have on the evolution and radiative properties of cirrus?
13
Research Tools LEM (cloud model) MC (3D radiation model)
14
IWC Time Evolution Rad No-Rad
15
Scales of inhomogeneity
Rad No-Rad
16
Spectral Dependence
17
PPA radiative transfer
18
ICA or IPA
19
Monte Carlo radiation
20
Radiative smoothing DZ
21
Inhomogeneity scale
22
Layer simulations MC IPA
23
Layer simulations Rmc=0.219 Rppa=0.225
24
Layer simulations Wavg IWC
25
Finite layers MC IPA
26
Finite simulations Rmc=0.423 Rppa=0.396
27
Finite simulations Wavg IWC
28
Discussion
29
Deep Convection Gerard Devine (Leeds)
30
Radiative Properties - Reflectance
+2.7 %
31
Radiative Properties - Absorptance
-1.45 %
32
Summary and Conclusions
Developed an Emerald case study Refined the diffusivity of water vapour Radiation drives inhomogeneity in cirrus 3D rad: Inhom stratiform layers: 2-3% Finite cirrus layers: 6-7% Competing effects Deep convection: 2-3% (domain size)
33
Future work Further comparisons with EMERALD and Chilbolton cases
3D radiation effects on EMERALD, Chilbolton, and Toga-Coare cases Thanks: NERC CWVC (NER/T/S/2000/00983)
35
Contact: dobbie@env.leeds.ac.uk
36
Future work [G. Heymsfield]
38
Stability Numbers
42
Layer simulations (Ripa – Rmc )/Rmc H ipa for R and H mc for A
43
Finite simulations
44
Instability (No Rad.)
45
Inhomogeneous layer
46
Effect of depth Keep?
47
Finite cirrus layer
48
Effects of shear on sub-grid variability
9.25 km 8.25 km Orange is with shear, Black is without (all are over 50 km in the horizontal and 375 m in the vertical). Ice water content Total Water Content
49
Effect of shear on vertical correlation of IWC
50
Motivation Climate is very sensitive to cirrus
Cirrus are poorly understood (GCSS WG2) Inhomogeneity and radiative properties
51
Instability (Rad. Influenced)
52
Observed and LEM profiles
53
Ice Water Contents (IWCs)
Radar LEM Approx km
54
Chilbolton Case Study
55
Radiative Heating Profiles
56
16 July C-F Anvil Mission P. Lawson D. Baumgardner A. Heymsfield
57
Observations:. Supersaturation Frequently Observed in the Upper
Observations: Supersaturation Frequently Observed in the Upper Troposphere [J. Smith, A. Anderson, P. Bui] We observe supersaturation both in clear air and in the presence of cirrus.
58
Observed and LEM profiles
Reading, Dec 8
59
Microphysics
60
Effects of shear on sub-grid variability
9.25 km 8.25 km Orange is with shear, Black is without (all are over 50 km in the horizontal and 375 m in the vertical). Ice water content Total Water Content
61
Effects of shear on sub-grid variability
6.5 km 4.7 km Orange is with shear, Black is without (all are over 50 km in the horizontal and 375 m in the vertical). Ice water content Total Water Content
62
Effect of shear on vertical correlation of IWC
63
Conclusions Further Work
Distributions of modelled IWCs and total water contents are well described by beta functions. Shear tends to decrease the variance in IWC and total water contents. The decorrelation of IWC with height is initially linear (as suggested in Hogan and Illingworth 2002). At larger vertical separations correlations tend to be zero for zero shear and are more complex for inhomogenous clouds with large wind-shears. Further Work Improve the initialisation of the LEM. Study a better observed case (with aircraft observations). (Acknowledgements: Robin Hogan, Reading University)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.