1. Summary of LSC Data Analysis Activities: Alan Wiseman
G Z
LSC at LHO
LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee

2. Review Standard/Procedure for APS
“Unlikely to change much” eg
“A few percent is ok”
Still worried about a factor of 2, not good enough.
The outcome of the review is not assumed.
This should begin to approach the steady state.
Reviewers will report to LSC Executive Committee
April 23 meeting.
There will be an LSC telecon of the talks
LSC at LHO
LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee

3. Results that will (might) be presented:
Burst (Patrick Sutton)
Gamma ray burst (triggered search)
Reviewers agree can use the paper as guide
4 ETG + r-statistic (untriggered)
“Narrative” of the analysis will be available by early April
This can be used as the guide for the review
If not “we will back off”
Inspiral
BNS
Draft and web pages being assembled will serve as the guide for the review
LSC at LHO
LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee

4. Results that will (might) be presented
Pulsar (Mike Landry)
Known pulsar (some issues about how many)
Draft is sufficient guide to allow the reviewers to do the job
Stochastic
Primary focus on H2-L1 correlation
Stuart “need a technical report”
But analysis hasn’t changed much from the s1 analyisis
LSC at LHO
LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee