1. Code Administration Code of Practice
KPIs Q3 2012
Tim Davis

2. Quality of assessment No reports “sent back” by Ofgem in Q3
Quarter 1
Ofgem
Implement
Reject
Panel 3 5 4
Quarter 2 1
Quarter 3
32 out of 40 accord.
No reports “sent back” by Ofgem in Q3
5 Q3 Ofgem Decisions accord with Panel (71%)

3. Effective communication
Glossary and plain English summary to be provided with reports
Part of standard documentation
Quarter 1
Quarter 2
Quarter 3
Number of Consultations 20 8 7
Average number of respondents
9.4
5.8
5.7

4. Efficient administration (1)
Percentage of papers published outside of modification rules requirements
Quarter 1 2
% UNC Modification Papers (Mods, DMRs, FMRs) 0%
Quarter 1 2 3
Meetings 72 73 70
Papers
310
288
283
% Late
17.42%
26%
19%

5. Efficient Administration (2)
Quarter 1 2
Quarter 3
Number and percentage of reports submitted to the authority in line with original timetable
9 (90%)
5 (71%)
5 (83%)
Quarter 1 2
Quarter 3
Number of extensions to timetable requested 6 7 3

6. Efficient Administration (3)
Average time between:
Quarter 1
Days 2 3
Proposal being raised and submitted for decision
226
172
279
Proposal being submitted for decision and decision being published
168 68 83
Decision and implementation (separately identifying systems and non-system changes)
63 (no systems changes)
43 (no systems changes)
32 (no systems changes)

7. Implementation costs Quarter 1 2 3
Number and percentage of reports for which implementation cost estimates were not available for consultation
2 (10%)
0 (0%)
Accuracy percentage difference (whether higher or lower) between estimated and actual implementation costs NA

8. Code Administration Code of Practice
KPIs Q3 2012
Tim Davis